RECORD: Darwin, C. R. [early draft titleof Origin] On the mutability of species [& other notes] CUL-DAR205.1.70 Transcribed by Kees Rookmaaker, edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed by Kees Rookmaaker, edited by John van Wyhe 09.2014. RN1

NOTE:

Editorial symbols used in the transcription:
[some text] 'some text' is an editorial insertion
[some text] 'some text' is the conjectured reading of an ambiguous word or passage
[some text] 'some text' is a description of a word or passage that cannot be transcribed
< > word(s) destroyed
<some text> 'some text' is a description of a destroyed word or passage
Text in small red font is a hyperlink or notes added by the editors.

Reproduced with the permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin.


70

On the
Mutability of Species

"Whewell"

by

C. Darwin, M. A, F.R.S.

John Murray. 1860!!

10

"Nascent" wd be good term applied to organs in contradistinction to "rudimentary" "aborted" — How hard to say, though utility forms the clear criterion which is nascent & which rudimentary, though we can say positively that some many parts are rudimentary — are penguins paddles

70 verso

Penguins wings possibly may be nascent — Steamer Duck (judging from affinity to other) & Apteryx certainly rudimentary. —

Swim bladder of Ameiva a nascent organ

nascent or rudimentary. —

We can perceive, that though in the formation of wings, all gradations may & must be useful to individuals (as we now see in penguins, steamers &c) yet that when wing once a flying organ, the numbers of species in this type wd immensely increase & so extinguish, numbers of animals in other types.


This document has been accessed 1335 times

Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, editor. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 10 October, 2014