RECORD: Darwin, C. R. et al. 1874. Memorial presented to the First Lord of the Treasury [W. E. Gladstone], respecting the National Herbaria. In Spencer Compton Cavendish, Fourth report of the Royal Commission on the scientific instruction and the advancement of science. Parliamentary Papers, Command Papers; Reports of Commissioners, paper number (884), volume XXII.1, pp. 31-2.
REVISION HISTORY: OCRed and corrected by John van Wyhe 7.2007. RN2
F.—MEMORIAL presented to the FIRST LORD of the TREASURY, respecting the NATIONAL HERBARIA.
[See p. 7.]1
To the Right Hon. W. E. Gladstone, First Lord of the Treasury.
THE undersigned persons engaged in the pursuit of botany, or in instruction therein, desire to call your serious attention to a subject that deeply concerns the progress of Natural Science, and that of those branches of agriculture, horticulture, forestry, and manufactures that largely depend on Botanical Research.
The First Commissioner of Works, in a Memorandum presented to Parliament before the close of last Session, clearly raised the question whether it is desirable to transfer to the branch of the British Museum about to be constructed at South Kensington, the Scientific Collections and Library now existing at Kew, and further stated that, pending the decision on that subject, he considers it his duty to take care that no new expense shall be incurred at Kew which will embarrass the Ministers of the Crown or the House of Commons in arriving at a decision.
The Lords of the Treasury, in their Minute of the 24th July, decline to refer to that portion of the above-mentioned Memorandum, and no statement on that subject has since been made by any Minister of the Crown which shows whether it has received the attention of the Government.
Being strongly of opinion that the proposed measure would be highly detrimental to the progress of Science, and injurious to all those interests that depend upon it, we beg to urge upon you that the subject is not one merely of Departmental Interest, and that it would not be unfitting your position, as First Minister of the Crown, to give your consideration to the following reasons, which we beg to urge in opposition to the proposed measure:—
1. That it appears to us that it is absolutely necessary that a great Botanical Garden like that at Kew, which is confessedly far the most important in the world, should be in close connexion with as perfect an Herbarium and Botanical Library as possible; and that these conditions are now fulfilled as far as circumstances and the present state of science will admit.
2. That such a combination of living and dead specimens is requisite for the complete study of plants, as regards their technical, physiological, and economic characters; and that the removal of the Herbarium would be a retrograde step in a scientific point of view.
3. That the records of the Colonial and India Offices will show of what immense importance the Establishment at Kew has been to the welfare of the entire British Empire, and that weighty questions are constantly submitted to the Director which require immediate attention, and which could not, in many cases, be satisfactorily answered without reference to the Library or Herbarium.
4. That every facility for the investigation of the intimate structure and general habit of plants, and the study of them in every point of view, which can reasonably be considered within the scope of pure Botany, is afforded by the Herbarium and Museum of Botany in connexion with the Garden, and that it would be easy to point out important labours in that direction which have been instituted at Kew, while the systematic treatment has always regarded the more minute characters as well as those which are superficial.
5. It has been remarked, indeed, that important works, such as the Hortus Kewensis, have been prepared without the aid of an Herbarium at Kew. We would, however, remark that the statement is not correct, as there was an Herbarium, which was dispersed before Sir W. J. Hooker became Director; and the conditions of Natural Science are at the present time so completely altered, that it is impossible to institute any fair comparison, the number of known species being enormously increased since the date of the publication in question.
6. That the Museums of Structural and Economic Botany, which owe their existence and importance to the late Sir W. J. Hooker, are often found of great value in the decision of critical points in the study of species, and that the severance of them from the Herbarium and Library would be a serious loss.
7. That in the principal Botanic Gardens on the Continent, where effective work is done, there is in every case a large Herbarium connected with them.
8. That, in the interest of Botanical Science, we think it highly desirable that, besides the collections now existing at Kew, an Herbarium, or collection of dried plants, as complete as possible, should be maintained in connexion with the Natural History Museum which it is proposed to place at South Kensington, and that the two Herbariums should be in intimate relation with each other.
9. That from the delicate and perishable nature of its contents, and the necessity of referring to numerous specimens, an Herbarium cannot be made use of by many persons at the same time; and while it is desirable that students should have ready means of access at the National Museum in London to collections which may enable them to identify the plants of any particular country, it is still more essential that the authors of important works in Botanical Science should be enabled, as at present, to pursue their labours at Kew without interruption from casual visitors.
10. That an Herbarium is the least costly of all Collections in Natural History, and that which requires the least amount of space for its proper maintenance, in proportion to the number of objects which it contains.
11. That the arrangements of the Herbarium at Kew are so perfect, and the facilities for study so great, that it is resorted to from all parts of the world; and it would, therefore, be unwise to make a change which in the result is almost certain to be detrimental, and which, we are assured, would be especially distasteful to the leading Foreign Botanists.
M. J. Berkeley, Botanical Director to the Royal Horticultural Society of London.
Charles C. Babington, Professor of Botany, Cambridge.
M. A. Lawson, Professor of Botany, Oxford.
J. H. Balfour, Professor of Botany, Edinburgh.
Alexander Dickson, Professor of Botany, Glasgow.
G. Dickie, Professor of Botany, Aberdeen.
Ed. Perceval Wright, Professor of Botany, Dublin.
Robert Bentley, F.L.S., Professor of Botany, King's College, and to the Pharmaceutical Society of London.
W. T. Thiselton Dyer, Professor of Botany, Royal Horticultural Society, London.
R. O. Cunningham, Professor of Botany and Zoology, Belfast.
W. R. McNab, Professor of Botany, Royal College of Science, Dublin.
George Henslow, M.A., F.L.S., Lecturer at St. Bartholomew's Hospital (London), and at the Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester.
John Ball, F.R.S.
Maxwell T. Masters, M.D., F.R.S.
James Bateman, F.R.S.
R. Trevor-Clarke, F.R.H.S.
W. Wilson Saunders, F.R.S.
Geo. F. Wilson, F.R.S.
Robert Hogg, LL.D., F.L.S,
W. Sowerby, F.L.S.
D. Moore, Ph.D., F.LS., M.R.I.A.
Andrew Murray, F.L.S.
William Munro, Major-General, C.B., F.L.S.
M. Pakenham Edgworth, F.L.S.
John Miers, F.R.S., V.P.L.S.
Frederick Currey, M.A., F.RS., Sec. L.S.
Daniel Hanbury, F.R.S., F.L.S.
C. E. Broome, M.A., F.L.S.
Leonard Blomefield, M.A., F.L.S.
J. T. Boswell Syme, LL.D., F.L.S.
Hugh Cleghorn, M.D., F.L.S.
Clements Markham, C.B., F.L.S.
R. C. A. Prior, M.D., F.L.S.
Edward J. Waring, M.D., F.L.S.
George C. M. Birdwood, M.D.
Walter Elliot, K.C.S.I., F.L.S.
J. Forbes Watson, M.A., M.D., F.L.S.
Richard Strachey, Maj-Gen., C.S.I., F.R.S.
E. W. Cooke, R.A., F.R.S., F.L.S.
Robert Braithwaite, M.D., F.L.S.
William Mitten, A.L.S.
W. Allport Leighton, B.A., F.L.S.
John Goucher, F.L.S.
1 One of the points on page seven introduces the memorial:
42. At present the Gardens occupy 300 acres, and are estimated to contain 20,000 species of plants; and the following Statement of the operations carried on at Kew is taken from a Memorial (signed by many eminent scientific men) presented to the First Lord of the Treasury in 1872.
Papers relating to Kew Gardens, p. 43, ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 25th of July 1872. See, also, a Second Memorial, Appendix II.
Appendix II is entitled 'DOCUMENTS relating to the BOTANICAL COLLECTIONS at KEW and at the BRITISH MUSEUM.' including the present Memorial. A copy of this memorial was published in Nature (16 January 1873), pp. 212-13. See also Darwin 1872.
J. Leicester Warren, M.A.
Worthington G. Smith, F.L.S.
M. C, Cooke, M.A.
James M. Crombie, M.A., F.L.S.
Alfred W. Bennett, M.A., B.Sc, F.L.S.
A. G. More, M.R.I.A., F.L.S.
Thomas Moore, F.L.S., Floricultural Director to the Royal Horticultural Society of London.
Thomas Thomson, M.D., F.R.S., late Superintendent of the Royal Botanic Garden, Calcutta.
Charles Darwin, M.A., F.R.S.
George Bentham, F.R.S.
Return to homepage
Citation: John van Wyhe, editor. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)
File last updated 2 July, 2012