Show results per page.
Search Help New search
Sort by
Results 351-385 of 385 for « +(+text:descent +text:with +text:modification) +(+name:darwin +name:charles +name:robert) »
    Page 8 of 8. Go to page:    
66%
F955    Book:     Darwin, C. R. 1882. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray. 2d ed., fifteenth thousand.   Text   Image   PDF
unimportant points. The greater number of naturalists who have taken into consideration the whole structure of man, including his mental faculties, have followed Blumenbach and Cuvier, and have placed man in a separate Order, under the title of the Bimana, and therefore on an equality with the orders of the Quadrumana, Carnivora, c. Recently many of our best naturalists have recurred to the view first propounded by Linnæus, so remarkable for his sagacity, and have placed man in the same Order with the
66%
F955    Book:     Darwin, C. R. 1882. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray. 2d ed., fifteenth thousand.   Text   Image   PDF
sex alone, may be grouped. Rules of this kind were first enounced by Cuvier; but with the progress of knowledge they require some modification and amplification. This I have attempted to do, as far as the extreme complexity of the subject permits, from information derived from various sources; but a full essay on this subject by some competent ornithologist is much needed. In order to ascertain 1 In regard to thrushes, shrikes, and woodpeckers, see Mr. Blyth, in Charlesworth's 'Mag. of Nat. Hist
59%
F1434    Book contribution:     Darwin, C. R. 1883. A posthumous essay on instinct. In Romanes, G. J., Mental evolution in animals. With a posthumous essay on instinct by Charles Darwin. London: Kegan Paul Trench & Co., pp. 188-189, 196, 198-199, 355-384.   Text   Image   PDF
differences to subsequent modification through natural selection. So when we hear that the thrush of South America (T. Falklandicus), like our European species, lines her nest in the same peculiar way with mud, though, from being surrounded by wholly different plants and animals, she must be placed under somewhat different conditions; or when we hear that in North America the males of the kitty wrens,† like the male of our species, have the strange and anomalous habit of making cock-nests, not lined
60%
F1804    Periodical contribution:     Darwin, C. R. 1883. The late Mr. Darwin on instinct. Nature. A Weekly Illustrated Journal of Science 29 (6 December): 128-129.   Text   Image   PDF
instinctive action may lead to results which fill the mind with astonishment. Moreover, it seems to me that the very general fact of the gradation of complexity of instincts within the limits of the same group of animals; and likewise the fact of two allied species, placed in two distant parts of the world and surrounded by wholly different conditions of life, still having very much in common in their instincts, supports our theory of descent; for they are explained by it: whereas if we look at each
73%
F1452.2    Book:     Darwin, Francis ed. 1887. The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. vol. 2. London: John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
Gray in the 'Atlantic.' It comes out very clearly that in the case of such publications as Dr. Gray's, my father did not rejoice over the success of his special view of Evolution, viz that modification is mainly due to Natural Selection; on the contrary, he felt strongly that the really important point was that the doctrine of Descent should be accepted. Thus he wrote to Professor Gray (May 11, 1863), with reference to Lyell's 'Antiquity of Man': You speak of Lyell as a judge; now what I complain
67%
F1452.2    Book:     Darwin, Francis ed. 1887. The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. vol. 2. London: John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
modification implies divergence, and we become so habituated to a belief in descent, and therefore in divergence, that we do not notice the absence of proof that divergence is in itself an advantage. As shown in the Autobiography, my father in 1876 found it hardly credible that he should have overlooked the problem and its solution. The following letter will be more in place here than its chronological position, since it shows what was my father's feeling as to the value of the Sketch at the
67%
F1452.2    Book:     Darwin, Francis ed. 1887. The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. vol. 2. London: John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
nearly a convert to my views. . Let me add I fully admit that there are very many difficulties not satisfactorily explained by my theory of descent with modification, but I cannot possibly believe that a false theory would explain so many classes of facts as I think it certainly does explain. On these grounds I drop my anchor, and believe that the difficulties will slowly disappear. C. Darwin to J. S. Henslow. Down, November 11th, 1859. MY DEAR HENSLOW, I have told Murray to send a copy of my book
66%
F1452.3    Book:     Darwin, Francis ed. 1887. The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. vol. 3. London: John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
DESCENT. 139; in the Times, iii. 139; in the Saturday Review, iii. 139; in the 'Quarterly Review,' iii. 146. Descent with modification, primary importance of the doctrine of, ii. 371. Descriptive work, blunting effect of, ii. 379. Design in Nature, i. 315, iii. 353, 373, 377, 378, 382; argument from, as to existence of God, i. 309. , evidence of, ii. 312. Devonian strata, insect with stridulating apparatus in the, iii. 97. Devonshire caverns, pre-glacial remains in, ii. 365. 'Dichogamy' of C
64%
F1452.2    Book:     Darwin, Francis ed. 1887. The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. vol. 2. London: John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
really good judges have remarked to me how desirable it would be that this should be exemplified and worked out in some detail and with some single group of beings. Now every one will admit that no one in the world could do this better than you with Brachiopods. The result might turn out very unfavourable to the views which I hold; if so, so much the better for those who are opposed to me. But I am inclined to suspect that on the whole it would be favourable to the notion of descent with
63%
F1452.2    Book:     Darwin, Francis ed. 1887. The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. vol. 2. London: John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
he would see that genealogy by itself does not give classification; I declare I cannot see a much closer approach to Wallace and me in Naudin than in Lamarck we all agree in modification and descent. If I do not hear from you I will return the 'Revue' in a few days (with the cover). I dare say Lyell would be glad to see it. By the way, I will retain the volume till I hear whether I shall or not send it to Lyell. I should rather like Lyell to see this note, though it is foolish work sticking up
63%
F1452.2    Book:     Darwin, Francis ed. 1887. The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. vol. 2. London: John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
paper on the subject. I can hardly doubt that many curious points would occur to any one thoroughly instructed in the subject, who would consider a group of beings under this point of view of descent with modification. All those forms which have come down from an ancient period very slightly modified ought, I think, to be omitted, and those forms alone considered which have undergone considerable change at each successive epoch. My fear is whether brachiopods have changed enough. The absolute
59%
F1452.3    Book:     Darwin, Francis ed. 1887. The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. vol. 3. London: John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
, i. 328. BRODERIP. Boulders on the Azores, ii. 112, 113. transported by floating ice, paper on, i. 302. Bournemouth, residence at, ii. 383. Bowen, Prof. F., hostile review by, in the 'Memoirs of the American Academy of Sciences,' ii. 349, 354; Asa Gray on the opinions of, ii. 359; on heredity, ii. 372. Brace, Mr. and Mrs. C. L., visit to Down, iii. 165. Brachiopoda, evidence from, of descent with modification, ii. 366. Brain, size of the, in the sexes of ants, iii. 191. Branch-climbers, iii. 317
54%
F2539    Periodical contribution:     Darwin, C. R. 1891. [Letter to Duke of Argyll, 1878]. Darwin on the unity of the human race. Nature, (5 March): 415.   Text   PDF
, however, it be assumed that a species at each successive stage of its modification was surrounded in two distinct countries or times by exactly the same assemblage of plants and animals, and by the same physical conditions, then I can see no theoretical difficulty to such a species giving birth to the new form in the two countries. If you will look to the sixth edition of my 'Origin,' at p. 100, you will find a somewhat analogous discussion perhaps more. Yours faithfully, Charles Darwin
64%
F1461    Book:     Darwin, Francis ed. 1892. Charles Darwin: his life told in an autobiographical chapter, and in a selected series of his published letters [abridged edition]. London: John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
Your boldness, however, sometimes makes me tremble, but as Huxley remarked, some one must be bold enough to make a beginning in drawing up tables of descent. Although you fully admit the imperfection of the geological record, yet Huxley agreed with me in thinking that you are sometimes rather rash in venturing to say at what periods the several groups first appeared. I have this advantage over you, that I remember how wonderfully different any statement on this subject made 20 years ago, would
60%
F1461    Book:     Darwin, Francis ed. 1892. Charles Darwin: his life told in an autobiographical chapter, and in a selected series of his published letters [abridged edition]. London: John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
A letter from Lyell to Hooker (Mar. 9, 1863), published in Lyell's Life and Letters, vol. ii. p. 361, shows what was his feeling at the time: He [Darwin] seems much disappointed that I do not go farther with him, or do not speak out more. I can only say that I have spoken out to the full extent of my present convictions, and even beyond my state of feeling as to man's unbroken descent from the brutes, and I find I am half converting not a few who were in arms against Darwin, and are even now
59%
F1592.1    Book:     Marchant, James ed. 1916. Alfred Russel Wallace letters and reminiscences. London: Cassell. Volume 1.   Text   Image   PDF
prevision of the enormous and all-important influence which that doctrine was destined to exercise upon every line of human thought. . . . It is in its application to the problems of human society that there still remains an enormous field of work and discovery for the Darwin- Wallace doctrine. In the special branch of study which Wallace himself set going the inquiry into the local variations, races, and species of insects as evidence of descent with modification, [page] 12
57%
F1592.2    Book:     Marchant, James ed. 1916. Alfred Russel Wallace letters and reminiscences. London: Cassell. Volume 2.   Text   Image   PDF
really do not go so far as he did. For he maintained that there was not any proof that the several great classes or kingdoms were descended from common ancestors. I maintain, on the contrary, that all without exception are now proved to have originated by descent with modification but that there is no proof, and no necessity, that the very same causes which have been sufficient to produce all the species of a genus or Older were those which initiated and developed the greater differences. At
57%
F1592.2    Book:     Marchant, James ed. 1916. Alfred Russel Wallace letters and reminiscences. London: Cassell. Volume 2.   Text   Image   PDF
certainly does, but the writer was highly imaginative, and, like all the other anticipators of Darwin, did not perceive the whole scope of his idea, being, as he himself says, not sufficiently acquainted with the facts of nature. His anticipations, however, of diverging lines of descent from a common ancestor, and of the transmission of disease germs by means of insects, are perfectly clear and very striking. As you yourself made known one of the anticipators of Darwin, whom he himself had
49%
F1592.2    Book:     Marchant, James ed. 1916. Alfred Russel Wallace letters and reminiscences. London: Cassell. Volume 2.   Text   Image   PDF
Forest superintendency, 302, 303; on Island Life, 305, 306; on Darwin's criticism of Island Life, 308; on Darwin's Movements of Plants, 311; on land migration of plants, 311; on Civil List pension, 314, 315; on Progress and Poverty, 317; on Darwin's Earthworms, 320 Wallace, Alfred Russel, letters to Sir Francis Darwin: on Darwin's Life and Letters, ii. 39; on descent with modification, 78; on mutation, 80 letter to Mr. W. J. Farmer, on final cause of varying colour of hairs, etc., ii. 101 2
70%
F1497    Book:     Darwin, C. R. 1958. The autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. With the original omissions restored. Edited and with appendix and notes by his grand-daughter Nora Barlow. London: Collins.   Text   Image   PDF
being preached by Paley and others, who not only took into account the increasing knowledge of adaptation in biology, but made a pivot of this very knowledge. Dr. Darwin looked at the facts of adaptation in the human body without the bias so general in 18th century science, a bias which saw a purpose in all the Creator's works for the immediate benefit of mankind; he produced his original theory of Generation or Descent with modification in his Zoönomia in 1794-6, partially anticipating
66%
F1497    Book:     Darwin, C. R. 1958. The autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809-1882. With the original omissions restored. Edited and with appendix and notes by his grand-daughter Nora Barlow. London: Collins.   Text   Image   PDF
. In February, 1879, a German scientific journal called Kosmos published an article by Dr. Krause about the Life and Works of Dr. Erasmus Darwin. In May, 1879, Butler, who had not then heard of the article, published Evolution, Old and New, or The Theories of Buffon, Dr. Erasmus Darwin and Lamarck as compared with that of Mr. Charles Darwin. One of the objects of this book was to show that the idea of descent with modification did not originate with Charles Darwin; and another was to restore mind
54%
F1598    Book:     Barlow, Nora ed. 1967. Darwin and Henslow. The growth of an idea. London: Bentham-Moxon Trust, John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
quarrels; an utter disbelief in the stability of my own genera and species...' In the Essay on the Tasmanian Flora, published 1859, and before the publication of O he expressed his views by using the Darwin-Wallace theory of descent with modification as a working hypothesis, thus approaching his whole-hearted support for Darwin's views so soon to follow. See Life and Letters of Sir Joseph Hooker, Vol. I, p. 374. 1 The Great Exhibition in Paris in 1855, rivalling the London exhibition of 1851
50%
F1598    Book:     Barlow, Nora ed. 1967. Darwin and Henslow. The growth of an idea. London: Bentham-Moxon Trust, John Murray.   Text   Image   PDF
work of his first voyage with Sir J. C. Ross's Antarctic expedition, 1839-43, published 1844-60; and the Essay on the Flora of Tasmania, 1860, when he was one of the first to use Darwin's and Wallace's Natural Selection theory as a working hypothesis for descent with modification. Also Handbook of New Zealand Flora, and Flora of the British Isles, and many other publications. See also Letters 70, 71, 73 and 74. 2 The British Association met in Oxford in 1847, under the Presidency of Sir Robert
60%
F3275    Book:     Gregorio, Mario A. -Di, ed. 1990. Charles Darwin's marginalia, vol. 1. Edited by Mario A. Di Gregorio, with the assistance of N.W. Gill. New York; London: Garland.   Text   PDF
focuses Darwin's philosophical emancipation from the Platonic eidos: According to [this] there are a number of fixed, unchangeable 'ideas' underlying the concept of variability, with the eidos (idea) being the only thing that is fixed and real, while the observed variability has no more reality than the shadows of an object on a cave wall . . . any commitment to an unchanging eidos precludes belief in descent with modifications. (Mayr, 1964, p. xix).9 For Darwin, the 'type' is simply the ancestor of
53%
F3275    Book:     Gregorio, Mario A. -Di, ed. 1990. Charles Darwin's marginalia, vol. 1. Edited by Mario A. Di Gregorio, with the assistance of N.W. Gill. New York; London: Garland.   Text   PDF
extinction ('ex'), especially again amongst closely-allied forms. Perhaps a decrease or unfavourable conditions might destroy the intermediate vars . . . (483c). Selection thus leads to divergence Cdv'); distinctions between populations, sharpened by extinction of intermediates ('ig') as against increase of those organisms in favourable stations Cgds'), permit us to speak of varieties, races, species, etc. This is the meaning of 'adaptation' ('ad') and 'descent with modification' ('ds', 'ts'
46%
F3275    Book:     Gregorio, Mario A. -Di, ed. 1990. Charles Darwin's marginalia, vol. 1. Edited by Mario A. Di Gregorio, with the assistance of N.W. Gill. New York; London: Garland.   Text   PDF
stage to rehearse his case in defence against the theories of others. Even his comments on the higher principles relating to his own theories are in the main quite cursory and matter-of-fact. The Natural System, he comments during his reading of Herbert (probably during the 1840s), seeks to know relationship does not attempt date of separation (376e), implying that the notion of descent with modification was already to be taken for [page] xv
44%
F3275    Book:     Gregorio, Mario A. -Di, ed. 1990. Charles Darwin's marginalia, vol. 1. Edited by Mario A. Di Gregorio, with the assistance of N.W. Gill. New York; London: Garland.   Text   PDF
-40m/31-35w each form in a successive bed. 52-54m/53-54u*+ 99 Im, 20u aufIX , 19-22m/w Table of Descent 47-48u^, 49-51m/50-52u einel Hauptverbreitung 100 3-4u während l auftreten , 4-12w Looks as if periods of rapid variation then of rest, but denies. 25-27w modification goes on in same district. 32u kein , 32u innerhalblstattfindet , 33-34u Auftreten lMutationen , 33-40w a row of forms divides into 2 rows only in separate districts 41-46m/42m/45w an exception 101 wt just what I have said 3-5m
44%
F3275    Book:     Gregorio, Mario A. -Di, ed. 1990. Charles Darwin's marginalia, vol. 1. Edited by Mario A. Di Gregorio, with the assistance of N.W. Gill. New York; London: Garland.   Text   PDF
lalMalpighia , 27-31m 789 1-Am, 5-8u±/7-10zu where has Mirbel done this?? 8-18u±, 18-24m, wb Descent is the key, least variable will then be best guide, whatever the part may be 791 wt Whatever parent form we can trace * modification wt ♦ so agrees with my theory 20-24m/25-27ml!!l28-32ml4-33w Schleiden Compositae Hooker some parasite So in parasite Lerneidae cirripedes, especially males of 33m/u Renonculacées , wb There is no highest, there is most modified but when much rudimentary, what we must call
55%
F763b    Book:     Darwin, C. R. 1991. The origin of species [in Russian]. Translation of the 6th ed. by K. A. Timiryazev, M. A. Menzbir, A. P. Pavlov and P. A. Petrovskii. Corrected and revised by A. D. Nekrasov, S. L. Sobol', A. L. Zelikman, Ya. M. Gall, A. L.Takhtadzhyan, Ya. I. Starobogatov and F. I. Krichevskaya. Edited by A. L. Takhtadzhyan. Prepared for publication by Ya. M. Gall. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.   Text
): , , , , , : - , , , (grades) , ; , ; - , , , , , , ", . - , , " (sudden leaps), , , . , . , , ; , , , , . , , , . , , , . 1846 . . '0 ' ( . J. d'Omalius d'Halloy) , (Bulletins de 1'Acad. Roy. Bruxelles, t. XIII, p. 581) , , (by descent with modification), : 1831 . . (Owen) 1849 (Nature of Limbs, p. 86) : , , . , . 1858 ( . LI) . ( . ), , : , Apteryx . , " ". , , , , , , , ; , , , , . , , , , 1858 , Apteryx , , , , . , - , , . , , , . , ; (Anat. of Vertebrates, vol. Ill, p. 796), . , , , : , (type-form
55%
F2043    Book:     Wyhe, John van ed. 2009. Charles Darwin's shorter publications 1829-1883. With a foreword by Janet Browne and Jim Secord. Cambridge: University Press.   Text
, zoology, embryology, physiology, taxonomy, anthropology, botany, psychology and more. After Darwin's death countless obituaries and biographical accounts continued to laud him as the one figure who had solved the greatest puzzles of life on earth. Against this it seems hardly relevant that many of them did not, or did not fully, accept Darwin's stress on natural selection as the primary mechanism for evolution or ‘descent with modification'. What Darwin did achieve was to convince the
45%
A690    Periodical contribution:     Wyhe, John van. 2010. 'Almighty God! what a wonderful discovery!': Did Charles Darwin really believe life came from space? Endeavour 34, no. 3, (September): 95-103.   Text
for life to have slowly evolved to its present state of complexity according to the gradual process of descent with modification and natural selection as proposed by Darwin and Wallace and most thoroughly elaborated and widely known from Darwin's Origin of species.4 A solution to this apparent impasse was proposed but the German physician Hermann Eberhard Richter in 1865. Building on previous suggestions that life on Earth came from elsewhere Richter proposed a 'cosmozoa' concept. We regard the
43%
A690    Periodical contribution:     Wyhe, John van. 2010. 'Almighty God! what a wonderful discovery!': Did Charles Darwin really believe life came from space? Endeavour 34, no. 3, (September): 95-103.   Text
organism are now present, which could ever have been present. But if (and oh! what a big if!) we could conceive some warm little pond, with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, light, heat, electricity, c, present, that a prot ine compound was chemically formed ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter would be instantly devoured or absorbed, 38 Darwin to J.D. Hooker [29 March 1863] The Correspondence of Charles Darwin (Cambridge U. Press), v. 11: 278. 39 On
43%
A690    Periodical contribution:     Wyhe, John van. 2010. 'Almighty God! what a wonderful discovery!': Did Charles Darwin really believe life came from space? Endeavour 34, no. 3, (September): 95-103.   Text
contemporaries of organic change over time via descent with modification, and primarily through natural selection. Insisting on a purely natural origin of life as well would make the theory of evolution appear too unorthodox for many of his readers. Even to the end of his life Darwin maintained that there was no evidence to support spontaneous generation. Though no evidence worth anything has as yet, in my opinion, been advanced in favour of a living being, being developed from inorganic matter
69%
F1881    Book:     Darwin, C. R. 2020. On the origin of species. The science classic. With an introduction by John van Wyhe. Capstone. 419pp.   Text
organic forms which is a consequence of the gradual change continuously and cumulatively operating over time.             At first, On the Origin of Species was extremely controversial and some exceedingly negative reviews appeared. But Darwin's arguments and evidence were hard to resist. Remarkably, within 15-20 years he was able to convince most of the international scientific community that descent with modification, or evolution, is a fact. Despite what many modern readers might encounter
65%
F1881    Book:     Darwin, C. R. 2020. On the origin of species. The science classic. With an introduction by John van Wyhe. Capstone. 419pp.   Text
and change through generations. Thus the existing species in the world were related not along a 'chain of being' or separated into artificially separate species categories but were all related on a genealogical family tree through descent with modification .             Darwin also identified another means by which some individuals would have descendants and others would not. He called this sexual selection. This theory explained why the male sex in many species is larger, produces colourful
    Page 8 of 8. Go to page: