RECORD: Anon. 1877. Carlyle versus Darwin. The Record (14 February): 3. CUL-DAR132.3b. Edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed by Christine Chua and edited by John van Wyhe 2.2021. RN2

NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin.


[page] 3

CARLYLE versus DARWIN.

Sir,—I have just seen your number of the 9th inst., and find that one of your correspondents persists (in spite of the contradiction that was inserted in the Times) in attributing to Mr. Carlyle a letter about Darwinism extracted from a Scotch paper. [Ardrossan and Salicoats Herald]

Allow me to say distinctly, on Mr. Carlyle's own authority, that the letter is a forgery, and that Mr. Carlyle has been greatly annoyed by the persistence with which it has been attributed to him.

Mr. Carlyle, as is well known to all his friends, is not a believer in the theory of Mr. Darwin, but that is no reason for attributing a letter which he never wrote, and expressions about an old friend which he never would have uttered.

Your obedient servant,

The Athenaeum, Feb. 12. W. E. H. LECKY.

[William Edward Hartpole Lecky, 1838-1903. an Anglo-Irish historian and essayist of classic Whig proclivities.]

(We have no doubt that our excellent correspondent the Rev. F. O. Morris would concur with us in fully accepting Mr. Lecky's assurance that the letter which was originally copied by the Times from the

[in Darwin's hand:] Record Feb. 14—1877


Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 25 October, 2022