RECORD: Darwin, C. R. 1857.07. Babingtons Manual of Brit. Botany (3d Edition) 1851. CUL-DAR16.231d-232. Edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed by Christine Chua and edited by John van Wyhe 3.2023. RN1

NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin. The volume CUL-DAR16 contains calculations and tables for Darwin's 'big book' Natural Selection F1583.


(5

I exclude Rubus Rosa, Hieracium Salix & Carex

Babington's Manual of Brit. Botany (3d. Edition) 1851. List of all the varieties marked by Greek Letters. I exclude the very doubtful species in Brackets [List not transcribed]

Babington

(These numbers are from Loudon Catalogue)

This is old list made a year or two ago, but I have marked it. C.D July 1857

(6

Most of the vars. are species of some one author. [List not transcribed]

(7

Babingtons Flora (I exclude vars alluded to under Bracket) Perhaps better not exclude but very few

[List not transcribed]

(8

(Conclusion)

Hence we see under what may be called a Fourth Category, viz forms which are considered even by Babington (3d Edit) as varieties, & distinguished by Greek Letters that there are enumerated 250. But I shd state that genera Rubus, Rosa, Hieracium, Salix & Carex are omitted; & further that a very few varieties have been excluded, these being rather alluded to, than fully admitted by Babington. I say there are 250 varieties belonging to 182 species, belonging to 117 genera as admitted in Loudon Catalogue, which I have taken as standard of comparison to save time.

These 117 )250 genera in the Loudon Catalogue have 607 species, hence each genus on average has 5.18.— Now the standard of comparison, or average in the Loudon Catalogue for all genera (the 5 excluded) we have seen is only 2.63. So that Babington vars. (vars which are or have been species in eyes of some very few Botanists) follow same law & belong on average to the larger genera. —


Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 7 September, 2023