RECORD: Darwin, C. R. [1880].11.26-1881.02.16. Petioles of Robinia / Draft of Cross and self fertilisation, folio 443. CUL-DAR162.114. Edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed by Christine Chua and edited by John van Wyhe 8.2023. RN1

NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin. The volume CUL-DAR162 contains letters to Darwin: Dabney – Dupré and miscellaneous notes pertaining to Expression, Cross and self fertilisation, Movement in plants and Earthworms.

Draft in the hand of Ebenezer Norman with corrections by Darwin. The text of the draft corresponds to Cross and self fertilisation, p. 228.


[114]

Nov 26 [1880]

Frank observed found at High Elms only 5 petioles of Robinia drawn in & 4/5 by base & pulvinus gnawed (Nov. 27th)

Nov 29' at the Teesdales — 9 drawn in by apex & 7 by base — 1 transversely.

1 [+] 9 [=] 10 drawn in by apex

4 [+] 7 [=] 11 — by base

Robinia

[114v]

fl—

2 & 6 of soil above tiles in big Hall

Buildings about 2/3 up sloping surface

soil 4 to 5 ft deep

Ch III

[114b]

Feb 16th 1881 Petioles of Robinia (Teesdale)

All these must have been drawn in since Frank last visit on Feb. 5th

By apex 16 [+] 19 [=] 35

By base 19

I think cause of so many being drawn in by base may be the extreme attenuation of the upper part of the 16 drawn in by apex 7 had extreme terminal attenuated part broken off.

(one 11 1/2 inches long)

[114c]

William — single fallen Rhododendron leaves

narrowest end basal

By base

153/237 = 65/100

narrowest end apical

63/237 = 27/102

no difference below 2 end

21/237 = 9/100

[114cv]

443

Margetts

Fagopyrum

XXXII Polygonaæ

Fagopyrum esculentum

This plant was discovered by Hildebrand to be heterostyled, that is to present like the species of Primula, a long-styled and short-styled form, which are adapted for reciprocal for fertilisation.

The following comparison, therefore, of the growth of the crossed and self-fertilised seedlings is not fair, for we do not know whether the difference between them may not be wholly due to the illegitimate fertilisation of the self-fertilised flowers.

I obtained seeds by legitimately crossing flowers

[bottom page excised]


Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 14 September, 2023