RECORD: Darwin, C. R. 1881.01.10. Letter to Krause, Ernst Ludwig / Draft of Cross and self fertilisation. CUL-DAR202.72. Edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed by Christine Chua and edited by John van Wyhe 10.2022. RN1

NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin.

Draft of Cross and self fertilisation in the hand of Ebenezer Norman with corrections by Darwin.

"Norman, Ebenezer, 1835/6-1923. 1854- Schoolmaster at Down and from 1856 and many years thereafter copyist for CD. 1856 Aug. 17 First payment for copying in CD's Account book (Down House MS). Many thereafter. CCD6:444. 1857 CD to Hooker, "I am employing a laboriously careful Schoolmaster". CCD6:443. 1858 CD to Hooker, "I can get the Down schoolmaster to do it [i.e. transcribe] on my return". CCD7:130. 1871 Banker's clerk in Deptford." (Paul van Helvert & John van Wyhe, Darwin: A Companion, 2021)


[72.1]

[Letter not transcribed]

[72.1v]

Mimulus

122

in the later self-fertilised generations to the complete exclusion of the original shorter kinds kinds varieties. The same variety also appeared amongst the crossed plants, and as I did it was not at first pay regarded with any particular attention to it, I know how far I it was used it in crossing for raising the intercrossed plants; but in the later crossed generations it did not occur frequently amongst them was not often present. Owing to the appearance of this tall variety the comparison of the crossed and self-fertilised plants of the fifth and succeeding generations was rendered unfair, as all the self-fertilised and only a few or more of the crossed plants consisted of the tall variety it. Nevertheless the results are of the later experiments are in some respects well worth giving.

Crossed and self-fertilised plants of the fourth generation. (Mimulus luteus) Seeds of the two kinds produced in the usual way from the two sets of plants of the third generation, were sown on opposite sides of two pots, (I and II); but they seedlings were not thinned enough, and were in consequence poor specimens did not grow vigorously well.

Many of the self-fertilised plants, especially in one of

[Cross and self fertilisation, p. 67: "In the next or fourth self-fertilised generation, several plants of a new and tall variety appeared, which increased in the later self-fertilised generations, owing to its great self-fertility, to the complete exclusion of the original kinds. The same variety also appeared amongst the crossed plants, but as it was not at first regarded with any particular attention, I know not how far it was used for raising the intercrossed plants; and in the later crossed generations it was rarely present. Owing to the appearance of this tall variety, the comparison of the crossed and self-fertilised plants of the fifth and succeeding generations was rendered unfair, as all the self-fertilised and only a few or none of the crossed plants consisted of it. Nevertheless, the results of the later experiments are in some respects well worth giving.
Crossed and self-fertilised Plants of the Fourth Generation.—Seeds of the two kinds, produced in the usual way from the two sets of plants of the third generation, were sown on opposite sides of two pots (I. and II.); but the seedlings were not thinned enough and did not grow well. Many of the self-fertilised plants, especially in one of the pots, consisted of the new and tall variety above referred to, which bore large and almost white flowers marked with crimson blotches. I will call it the White variety."]

[72.2]

[Letter not transcribed]


Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 7 December, 2022