RECORD: Darwin, C. R. n.d. Relations of affinity are directly due to consanguinity. CUL-DAR205.5.44. Edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed by Christine Chua and edited by John van Wyhe 1.2023. RN1

NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin. The volume CUL-DAR205.5 contains notes on the principle of divergence, transitional organs and instincts.


[44]

Relations of affinity are those directly due to consanguinity, (& remotely to similarity of conditions??) relations of analogy are remotely due to consanguinity (in such cases as dragon-fly & goat sucker &c perhaps not at all) & chiefly to similarity of conditions.— This solves the problem, & agrees with Charlesworth Mag. May 1840 Stricklands notion of "system of nature" being the foundation of the differences in 2 kinds of relation.—

State according to my theory there must be three kinds of relation — then see whether there are.— Lamarck gives my whole theory.— My theory does not explain such resemblances, as snout of rat & woodcock — small eye of pig & humming Bird!!! Ø

[44v]

How came Natural System to be discovered? Was it not same sense by which one knows family-likeness — in this sense Linnaeus was right, when he called it a latent instinct

With this explain Waterhouse's fact of carabidous-looking Heteromerous insect & vice versâ. ⎯


Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 4 March, 2023