RECORD: Darwin, C. R. 1842.08. Waterhouse says in one difficult genus two species had been doubted. CUL-DAR205.6.23. Edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed by Christine Chua and edited by John van Wyhe 11.2021. RN1

NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin. The volume CUL-DAR205.6 contains notes on embryology [pigeons].


[23]

Augt 1842.

Waterhouse says in one difficult genus two species had been doubted whether distinct, until caterpillars had been examined, when they were at once seen to be different apparently more so than in imago. In two spinxes Sphinxes, which are quite like except in markings wh are very different; the caterpillars are very like, but yet can be distinguished. Caterpillars of Moths butterflies & Sphingidæ almost as readily distinguished as imagos - in the geometric caterpillars much similarity - but imagos differ much in their markings. Question hard to settle. How is it in young birds?

In one of Doubleday letters there are cases of moths very like with unlike caterpillars & I think reverse case


Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 25 September, 2022