[358]

22

One of the most Distinguished Pal. in Europe Prof Pictet, admits (Bibliotheque Universelle beginning of 1860 in Review of Origin) the action of N. S. is in itself probable & that it accounts for origin of every reputed sp. - He admits that it accounts admirably (see [illeg]) for many pal. facts &c &c &c, yet he rejects the theory chiefly on account of (enumerate) facts what would all necessarily follow as imperfection of Record - I might ask why does he assume the record to be so perfect? What grounds except being educated in these views in accordance

[358v]

22

with common belief? He admits very wide gaps why not more. I suppose most geologists will admit that more areas are stationary than rising or sinking - probably ten times as long. It seems highly improbable that each rising & sinking shd follow each other without a stationary interval - if so so certain of station - 1 of rising 10 of stationary, 1 of sinking = 22 period of time for one of sinking ∴ 1/22 of organisms wd be preserved but only when sediment forming is sufficient quantity & area.

Thrust of west coast of S. America since secondary period! I can easily believe Europe may have sunk too much several times so that no sediment deposited.

[Left margin:] Quote Lyell (Good!)

[Right margin:] This argument applied only to each strata & not to all Europe