RECORD: Darwin, C. R. 1862.10. Short-styled Devon plant— Lythrum salicaria. CUL-DAR27.2.B19-B21. Edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed by Christine Chua and edited by John van Wyhe 12.2022. RN1

NOTE: Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin.


[19]

Oct. 1862 Short-styled Devon Plants.— Lythrum salicaria

Pollen of long-styled form Longer stamens 4 flowers fertilised (white silk)

no pod no pod no pod no pod

6 8

Pollen of Long-styled form Shorter stamens

6 flowers fertilised (Black silk)

69 61 88 66 [total] 284/6

4/6 set (perhaps 5/6 see below)

Pollen of mid styled form Longer stamens

4 flowers fertilised (White wool)

no pod no pod no pod no pod

6 8

Pollen of mid-styled form Shorter stamens

6 flowers fertilised (Black wool wood)

93 77 48 43 4/6 set

6

Own pollen (green) Longer stamens

3 flowers fertilised (White thread)

no pod no pod no pod

7 9

Own pollen Shorter stamens

3 flowers fertilised (Black thread)

64 — I suspect I crossed this flower as if it had been black silk

no pod no pod

9 7

Two branches fertilised with Camel B. carelessly not one pod

Self-fertilised only 2 pods 20. very poor seeds

6

(could hardly have got pollen, without I dropped any from other plant as under separate net.—

 

I might perhaps cross few of these, but not of midstyled

1862 — 88 flower fertilised

1863 126 will have to be fertilise

[20]

Oct. 1862 Long-styled Hartfield & Down Plants of L. salicaria

Pollen of mid styled Longer stamens green

5 flowers said to be fertilised (White wool

3 36 0 81 no pod no pod 3/5 set

7

Pollen of mid-styled Shorter stamens

5 flowers fertilised (Black wool)

3 no pod no pod no pod no pod

 7

Pollen of short styled Longer stamen green White

6 flowers fertilised (White silk)

159 43 96 —(poor seed) 103 4/6 set

6

Pollen of short styled Shorter stamens

4 flowers fertilised (Black silk)

20 1/4 set

8

 

Own pollen Longer stamens

8 flowers fertilised (White thread)

2 10 23 3/8 set all Devon Plants

7

Own pollen Shorter-stamens.

8 flowers fertilised (Black thread)

4 8 4 3/8 set all Devon Plants

7

Two branches carelessly fertilised by both pollens Hartfield Plants

0 0 13 Devon Plant

24 10 8 18} fertilised by myself

11 6 15 24} on one branch

[total] 116/8 [=] 14.5 average

[calculations not transcribed]

Perhaps I might reduce not to be fertilised

Self-fertilised under net altogether 29 pods on Devon Plants, of which I counted seed in 10 of them

7 3 2 5 6 13 5 10 5 7

[total] 63 / 10 [=] 6.3

 

 

The Hartfield plant produced, though so big 8 pods, which contained as follows.

3 6 4 0 47 — (Perhaps was a marked plant flower of which string had dropped off

7 10 22

52 / 6 [=] 8.6 per pod

as Hartfield so sterile disregard the proportion of flowers set & trust to number of seed.

[21]

October 1862 Mid-styled Kew, Lythrum salicaria

Pollen of Long-styled

5 flowers said to be fertilised, but 6 pods found marked (White silk)

Longer stamens

138 149 147 109 133 144 [=] 820} (all pods set averge 136.6

6

Pollen of Long-styled

3 flowers fertilised. (Black silk)

Short-stamens

83 no pod no pod

9

 

Pollen of short-styled Longer green stamens (White wool)

6 flowers fertilised

130 115 14 6 2 9 (all pods set)

6

Pollen of short-styled Short-yellow stamens. (Black wool)

5 flowers fertilised

112 130 143 100} 33 average 121.2

(all pods set)

7

Own Pollen Longer green pollen

3 flowers fertilised (White thread)

92 9 63 (all pods set

136*

9

Own pollen Shorter yellow pollen

3 flowers fertilised (White Black thread)

(no pods set)

9

Fertilised carelessly with both pollens with camel-brush two Branches

3 12 13 20 0 7

[=] 55 / 5 [=] 11à This in contrast with effect of own green pollen (for I presume own yellow cannot be injurious) shows me that all the experiment done with camel not to be trusted

Try 5 with Both Pollen

Self-fertilised on whole plant only 5 pods under net

42 10 101 — some insect brought pollen from other plant??

26 0

78 / 3 6 18 [=] 26.0 per pod.

 


Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 23 December, 2022