RECORD: Darwin, C. R. n.d. Corydalis tuberosa. CUL-DAR51.B17. Edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed by Christine Chua and edited by John van Wyhe 1.2022. RN1

NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin.

Darwin cited this in Variation 2: 58, n66: "'Natural Hist. Review,' April, 1863, p. 258. See also his Lecture, Royal Institution, March 16, 1860. On same subject, see Moquin-Tandon, 'Eléments de Tératologie,' 1841, pp. 184, 352."

Maxwell T. masters. 1863. On the existence of two forms of peloria. Natural History Review 10, n.s.: 258-262.


[B17]

Corydalis tuberosa has one nectary white, small 1/2 aborted with no nectar - pistil bent to side of good nectary - hood formed by [illeg] petals slip off in opposite direction - Now on my Plants several flowers had both nectaries purple of full equal size, with nectar - Pistil straight & hood slip off either way. Say structure of Dielytra Adlumia &c thus seems typical symmetrical structure & my Corydalis

[over]

[B17v]

a return- May it not be a return in Antirrhinum? see Masters paper in N. His Review No X. Ap. 1 1863 p. 259 - I must not speak of the Antirrhinum as a return positively - unless the parent-form was like a Columbine - But there is I think he says one form of this Antirrhinum Elatina, which has no nectaries

see Paper & Quote it


Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 25 September, 2022