RECORD: Darwin, C. R. 01.[1881]. Ash petioles field — only few in each hole drawn in by apex [Earthworm research notes] CUL-DAR65.39-39v. Edited by John van Wyhe (The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Prepared and edited by John van Wyhe 7.2025. RN1

NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin. The volume CUL-DAR65 contains materials for Earthworms.


39

Jan 4th [1881] Ash petioles field — only few in each hole

Drawn in by apex 5 (+ 1 doubtful)

Jan 5 29

Jan 6 Another day 37 [total] 71

Jan 7th 40

71+40 [=] 111

Drawn in by Base conically thicker & square

10

Jan 5 21 * Back

6 42

73 [+] 45 [=] 118

111 [+] 118 [=] 229

Jan 7 of the 45 drawn in by base 24 gnawed, but it is not always manifest whether the gnawing is [real]

Petioles of Clematis in Verandah, dragged into holes in gravel-walk& lawn for 2 1/2 to even 4 1/2 inches in depth

17 dragged into 1 hole

Drawn in by apex 13

in same hole (10) 8

From several holes 39

[total] 60 [+] 49

Gravel walk (same) [total] 109

On but turf border to lawn & on lawn itself 62

In narrow bed of mould & end of verandah 68

Total 239

Drawn in by base 4 [+] 2 [+] 11 [=] 17 [+] 10 [=] 27

Collected on different places & days points always in excess of Bases

Proportion of points greater on gravel-walk turf or mould beds

(over)

39v

Jan 5th * Of the 21 ash-petioles drawn in by base all except 3 ie 18 had thick end when leaf articulated with branch gnawed & this explains why so many there drawn in — Apparently many petioles are temporarily drawn in & then rejected for many lay strewn round holes — Some drawn in for protection of burrow & some for food — base thick & fleshy.

Jan 6 37 drawn in by tip, tips perhaps 6 gnawed — of the 42 drawn in by base, only 6 not gnawed. Of the 37 — drawn in by tip, 5 had previously been gnawed at base. I have no doubt the petioles are drawn in by base, gnawed & then pushed out of hole. The bases of petioles much enlarged.

Clematis I believe C. Montana — petiole thicker at base, but not enlarged like ash petiole — How are pet of Robinia Taper only moderately

Observation to test intellectual power of if such an expression may be used, or the discrimination of such lowly organised creatures as worms.

I doubt about pricking, though such was appearance in case of Pine leaves — as small rose-thorns, very sharp front of glass & hard score with very sharp projecting points

39V

Jan 8th 1881 — Mem ash-trees in Field surface partly thickly strewn with old petioles; I picked up 47 petioles, where they lay with thick mud a casting; of the 47, 14 had been gnawed at the broad basal end (or a little above the articulation, as is often the case with those drawn into burrows). Thus sufficient to show that worms after drawing in petioles into burrows; reject them as not fitted for protective purpose as cannot easily for draw far down holes, for many of the 47 had partly fallen on surface & had never been touched by worms.


Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 28 July, 2025