RECORD: Darwin, C. R. [1868]. Their full development is supposed to depend on their affinity. CUL-DAR94.96-97. Edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)
REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed by Christine Chua and edited by John van Wyhe 8.2023. RN1
NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library and William Huxley Darwin. The volume CUL-DAR94 contains correspondence, mainly to J. D. Hooker. See Variation 1: 374.
[1]
Whilst Their full development is supposed to depend on their affinity for, & union with, other partially developed cells in due order of succession. Gemmules which are do not thus become developed may be transmitted during many successive generations, & thus account for we can thus understand the many well-known & remarkable cases of reversion or atavism.
Thus n not only….
[2]
[Copied extract from J. D. Hooker's Presidential Address to the British Association, 1868.]
Mr Darwin suggests an explanation by assuming that each such cell or fragment of a a plant contains myriads of gemmules, each all each all of which he supposed to have been derived (thrown off) from the separate cells of the mother-plant, & that these the gemmules having the power of multiplication & of circulating throughout out all the tissues of which the plant. consists
Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)
File last updated 12 September, 2023