RECORD: Darwin, C. R. 5.7.1844-8.1854. Memo to Emma Darwin on species theory sketch. NHM-MSS-DAR4. (John van Wyhe ed., 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed and edited by John van Wyhe. RN4

NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced by permission of the Trustees of the Natural History Museum (London) and William Huxley Darwin. The memo was published with important editorial notes in Correspondence vol. 3, pp. 43-5. The present transcription makes some small improvements.

In recent years it been claimed that in this note, Darwin asked his wife Emma to publish his theory of evolution only after his death. This is completely false as the text of the memo makes unmistakeably clear. Darwin asked Emma, in case he died prematurely, to get a qualified editor to do all the work necessary to work up the sketch to a publishable condition, which it currently was not. The bulk of the memo is spent on how to select a qualified person to do the work, the books and notes to be given to him, the huge sum of money to be offered for so much work, etc. The 1844 species sketch or essay was Darwin's working out of his theory of evolution as it then stood, he was far from finished and he many times said that this early draft was never intended for publication. The 1844 sketch is now in CUL-DAR7. Darwin sent this out to a professional copyist to have a fair copy made from his messy rough draft. That is now in CUL-DAR113. The sketch was first published by his son Francis in 1909 as Foundations.

See John van Wyhe, Mind the gap: Did Darwin avoid publishing his theory for many years? Notes and Records of the Royal Society 61 (2006): 177-205 and van Wyhe, Dispelling the darkness, 2013, chapter 10.


[1]

Read Enclosure [enclosure is missing]

Down. July 5th. — 1844

My Dear Emma.

I have just finished my sketch of my species theory. If, as I believe that my theory is true & if it be accepted even by one competent judge, it will be a considerable step in science.

I therefore write this, in case of my sudden death, as my most solemn & last request, which I am sure you will consider the same as if legally entered in my will, that you will devote 400£ to its publication & further will yourself, or through Hensleigh, take trouble in promoting it.— I wish that my sketch be given to some competent person, with this sum to induce him to take trouble in its improvement. & enlargement.— I give to him all my Books on Natural History, which are either scored or have references at end to the pages, begging him carefully to look over & consider such passages, as actually bearing or by possibility bearing on this subject.— I wish you to make a list of all such books, as some temptation to an Editor. I also request that

[2]

you loan hand over him all those scraps roughly divided in eight or ten brown paper Portfolios:— The scraps with copied quotations from various works are those which may aid my Editor.— I also request that (or some amanuensis) will aid in deciphering any of the scraps which the Editor may think possibly of use.— I leave to the Editor's judgment whether to interpolate these facts in the text, or as notes, or under appendices. As the looking over the references & scraps will be a long labour, & as the correcting & enlarging & altering my sketch will also take considerable time, I leave this sum of 400£ as some remuneration & any profits from the work.— I consider that for this the Editor is bound to get the sketch published either at a Publishers or his own risk. Many of the scraps in the Portfolios contains mere rude suggestions & early views now useless, & many of the facts

[3]

will probably turn out as having no bearing on my theory.

With respect to Editors.— Mr Lyell would be the best if he would undertake it: I believe he wd find the work pleasant & he wd learn some facts new to him. As the Editor must be a geologist, as well as Naturalist. The next best Editor would be Professor Forbes of London. or Mr Lonsdale (if his health wd permit). The next best (& quite best in many respects) would be Professor Henslow??.      Dr Hooker would perhaps correct the Botanical Part probably = possibly he would do as Editor=     Dr Hooker would be very good The next, Mr Strickland.— Professor Owen wd be very good, but I presume he wd not undertake such a work. If no[ne] of these would undertake it, I would request you to consult with Mr Lyell, or some other capable man, for some Editor, a geologist & naturalist.

Should one other hundred Pounds, make the difference of procuring a good Editor, I request earnestly that you will raise 500£.

My remaining collection in Natural History, may be given to anyone or any Museum, where it wd be accepted:—

    My dear Wife

    Yours affect

    C. R. Darwin

[4]

If there shd be any difficulty in getting an editor who would go thoroughily into the subject & think of the bearing of the passages marked in the Books & copied out on scraps of Paper, then let my sketch be published as it is, stating that it was done several years ago & from memory, without consulting any works & with no intention of publication in its present form—

 

Mrs C. Darwin.

 

P S
Lyell, especially with the aid of Hooker (& of any good zoological aid) would be best of all

Without an Editor will pledge himself to give up time to it, it would be of no use paying such a sum.—

 

Hooker by far best Man to edit my Species volume Aug. 1854

NB When new Will made make Trusts open.

[not in Darwin's hand:] Directions about publishing Origin 1844


Return to homepage

Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)

File last updated 27 November, 2025