RECORD: FitzRoy, Robert to William Hepworth Dixon. 29.11.1859. [Letter on Darwin's Origin of species.] CUL-DAR221.4.253. Edited by John van Wyhe (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)
REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed and edited by John van Wyhe, corrections by Gordon Chancellor 2.2025. RN2
NOTE: See record in the Darwin Online manuscript catalogue, enter its Identifier here. Reproduced with permission of the Syndics of Cambridge University Library. This is an early photocopy of the original letter.
William Hepworth Dixon (1821-1879) was the editor of the Athenaeum from 1853-1869. FitzRoy refers to the recent anonymous review: [Leifchild, John R.] 1859. [Review of Origin]. Athenaeum no. 1673 (19 November): 659-60. [CUL-DAR226.1.8]. Text & image PDF A506
[1]
[annotated: "Admiral Fitzroy"]
1 Parliament Street
Nov. 29. 1859
Sir
I am honoured by the letter received from you just now: and I thank you cordially for it.
The champions of ships' magnetism are so well able to take their own
Hepworth Dixon Esq.
[annotated: "(1821-1879 Editor of the Athenaeum)"]
[2]
own part, and do good public service by their honourable emulation— that no others, however prepared, neer interfere in the present tournament.
While you are (I should say) arbiter verum — the judge or marshal of the lists who will cast down his baton —my brother "practicus" and I look on eagerly
[3]
eagerly at the contest between two first rate mathematicians.
Sabine, alas, is now too infirm to take his part — and still less Herschel.
I wish some M.S. notes on the so called "celts" had been sent to you, instead of to the editor of the Times —on the 19th instant — (before I had seen Professor Henslow's letter in the Athenæum
[4]
Athenæum of that day.)
I first confident of their value (in the cause of truth) but on copy was kept by me —and, as yet, they have not appeared.—
Perhaps there were too much in accordance with the spirit of that incomparable critique (of Nov. 19) on my poor friend and five years messmate Charles Darwin.
Remarkably—I had just glanced at his book, the day
[5]
day before that Athenæum appeared — and at once wrote to express my alarm at his extreme views.— I noticed a few salient points, (also remarked in the critique) and ended by saying— "My dear old friend—I, at least, cannot find anything "ennobling" in the reflection that thought of being a descendant of even the most ancient Ape". He has not replied.
[6]
I presume that Darwin's whole time for some years has been so much engrossed by his own avocations — his pigeon and rabbit breeding and his microscopic investigations — that he has scarcely used a telescope — for a wide range, and comprehensive view — has hardly read the works of later
[7]
Authorities—except those bits of them which he could use in his own work. This used to be his habit—and the consequence was partial instead of fair results.
I will try to recover my "celtic" paper — (some half dozen MS. Pages) from the Times —and, if I can obtain it —will send
[8]
It for the perusal of yourself —or the writer of that critique — or Professor Henslow —as you may please.
I am sorry to find Huxley — Tyndall & a few young savans inclined to side with C. Darwin — etiam in extremis.
I have the honour to be
Very respectully
Robert FitzRoy
[annotated: "Commanded HMS Beagle & sometime Governor of New Zealand"]
Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)
File last updated 18 February, 2025