RECORD: Darwin, C. R. 1875. [Letter to R. D. Fitzgerald]. The book of Australian Orchids. The Sydney Morning Herald (16 September): 5.
REVISION HISTORY: Transcribed and edited by John van Wyhe 8.2022. RN1
NOTE: See record in the Freeman Bibliographical Database, enter its Identifier here.
Robert David Fitzgerald (1830-1892) was an Irish-born surveyor and naturalist in Australia. Darwin received the first part of Fitzgerald. 1875-94. Australian orchids. 2 vols. Sydney: Thomas Richards. The complete letter with important notes is published in Correspondence vol. 23, pp. 276-7. The omitted sentences are: "I have found it almost necessary to observe insects at work to understand the meaning of the parts in orchids & on this head I see that you are a disbeliever. From not having been able to act in this manner I blundered about Cypripedium; but I do not think I have erred about the nectary of Angraecum, & Wallace has given the case of a sphinx with proboscis of sufficient length." The fact that this letter was published was not previously known.
[page] 5
THE BOOK OF AUSTRALIAN ORCHIDS.
THE following letter from Charles Darwin, the eminent naturalist, relates to Mr. Fitzgerald's recently published book on Australian Orchids. Such an acknowledgment from a great English writer on the fertilization of orchids cannot fail to be interesting to Mr. Fitzgerald, and also to those who have read the first part of his scientific work:—
"Down, Beckenham, Kent Railway Station,
Orpingham S. E. R., July 16, 1875.
"Sir,—Owing to Mr. Russell not having found my proper address, and his subsequent absence on the Continent, I received the present of your magnificent work, with its excellent illustrations, only about a week ago. I have now read it with much interest. I am astonished that such a work could have been prepared at Sydney. I have been particularly interested by your account of the movements of Pterostylis and Caledonia. Do you think it possible that the calli on the labellum are gnawed or sucked by insects? A careful examination of the flowers from which the pollinia have been removed by insects would be well worth making. I daresay you have seen a good paper on the former genus in a late volume of the New Zealand Institute. I have been even more interested about the closed flowers of Thelymitra, as the case is closely analogous to the equally inaccessible one of the bee ophrys in Europe. I suppose you have few coadjutors, but it would be well to ascertain whether the flowers are closed during years when the seasons are very different, and in all parts of the plant's range. I will venture to make one other suggestion, viz., with sterile species like Dendrobium Hillii, to try the effect of pollen taken from a distinct seedling plant, in accordance with the observations of Fritz Müller.
* * * * *
"With my best thanks and good wishes for your future success,
"I remain, dear Sir, yours faithfully,
(Signed) "CH. DARWIN."
Citation: John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. (http://darwin-online.org.uk/)
File last updated 28 November, 2022