→
Chapter
.—
1859 1861 |
Chapter
— .
1860 |
Chapter
. 1866 1869 |
Chapter
. 1872 |
|
→ ever lived, have come to 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
arrived at 1869 1872 |
|
→ of 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
to the action of 1869 1872 |
|
→ generally unknown differences 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
differences, generally of an unknown nature, 1869 1872 |
|
→ them becoming inarched 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
their inarching 1869 1872 |
|
→ between pure species, which have their reproductive systems perfect, seems to depend on several circumstances; in some cases largely on the early death of the embryo. 1859 1860 1861 |
and of their hybrid progeny has not, as far as we can judge, been increased through natural selection so as to attain that high degree which is universal with species when rendered widely distinct. 1866 |
and of their hybrid progeny has not, as far as we can judge, been acquired through natural selection. 1869 |
and of their hybrid progeny has not been acquired through natural selection. In the case of first crosses it seems to depend on several circumstances; in some instances in chief part on the early death of the embryo. 1872 |
|
astonishing fact. But it harmonises perfectly with the view that there is no essential distinction between species and varieties. |
→
Chapter
.—
|
First crosses between
sufficiently distinct to be ranked as species, and their hybrids, are very generally, but not universally, sterile. The sterility is of all degrees, and is often so slight that the
most careful experimentalists
have
→ever lived, have come to
diametrically opposite conclusions in ranking forms by this test. The sterility is innately variable in individuals of the same species, and is eminently susceptible
→of
favourable and unfavourable conditions. The degree of sterility does not strictly follow systematic affinity, but is governed by several curious and complex laws. It is generally different, and sometimes widely different, in reciprocal crosses between the same two species. It is not always equal in degree in a first cross and in the
produced from this cross. |
|
In the same manner as in grafting trees, the capacity of one species or variety to take on another, is incidental on
→generally unknown differences
in their vegetative systems, so in crossing, the greater or less facility of one species to unite with
is incidental on unknown differences in their reproductive systems. There is no more reason to think that species have been specially endowed with various degrees of sterility to prevent
crossing and blending in nature, than to think that trees have been specially endowed with various and somewhat analogous degrees of difficulty in being grafted together in order to prevent
→them becoming inarched
in our forests. |
|
The sterility of first crosses
→between pure species, which have their reproductive systems perfect, seems to depend on several circumstances; in some cases largely on the early death of the embryo.
|