See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

true. 1859 1860 1861
true, with the exception of New Zealand, of the Andaman Islands, and perhaps of the Salomon Islands. 1866 1869
true, with the exception of New Zealand, New Caledonia, the Andaman Islands, and perhaps the Salomon Islands and the Seychelles. 1872

I have, however, been assured that a frog exists on the mountains of the great island of 1859 1860 1861
But I have already remarked that it is doubtful whether 1866

but I suspect that this exception (if the information be correct) may be explained through glacial agency. 1859 1860 1861
ought to be classed as an oceanic island; and this is still more doubtful with respect to the Andaman and Salomon groups. 1866

1 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1866; present in 1869 1872
But I have already remarked that it is doubtful whether New Zealand ought to be classed as an oceanic island; and this is still more doubtful with respect to the Andaman and Salomon groups.

known to be 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869
OMIT 1872

by sea-water, on my view we can see that 1859 1860
by sea-water, 1861 1866 1869
(with the exception, as far as known, of one Indian species) by sea-water, 1872

why 1859 1860
on my view we can see why 1861 1866
we can see why 1869 1872

but 1859 1860 1861 1866
and as yet I 1869
and 1872

finished my search; as yet I have not 1859 1860 1861 1866
OMIT 1869 1872

moreover, 1859 1860
distant from it about 280 miles; moreover, 1861 1866
at the distance of about 280 miles; moreover, 1869 1872

oceanic islands, Bory St. Vincent long ago remarked that Batrachians (frogs, toads, newts)
are
have
never
been
been
found on any of the many islands with which the great oceans are studded. I have taken pains to verify this assertion, and
I
I
have found it
strictly
strictly
true. I have, however, been assured that a frog exists on the mountains of the great island of New
Zealand
Zealand;
but I suspect that this exception (if the information be correct) may be explained through glacial agency. This general absence of frogs, toads, and newts on so many
true oceanic
oceanic
islands cannot be accounted for by their physical
conditions:
conditions;
indeed it seems that islands are peculiarly
well
well
fitted for these animals; for frogs have been introduced into Madeira, the Azores, and Mauritius, and have multiplied so
as-to
as to
become a nuisance. But as these animals and their spawn are known to be immediately killed by sea-water, on my view we can see that there would be great difficulty in their transportal across the sea, and therefore why they do not exist on
strictly
any
oceanic
islands.
island.
But why, on the theory of creation, they should not have been created there, it would be very difficult to explain.
Mammals offer another and similar case. I have carefully searched the oldest voyages, but have not finished my search; as yet I have not found a single instance, free from doubt, of a terrestrial mammal (excluding domesticated animals kept by the natives) inhabiting an island situated above 300 miles from a continent or great continental island; and many islands situated at a much less distance are equally barren. The Falkland Islands, which are inhabited by a wolf-like fox, come nearest to an exception; but this group cannot be considered as oceanic, as it lies on a bank
in connection
connected
with the
mainland,
mainland
mainland;
moreover, icebergs formerly brought boulders to its western shores, and they may