See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1859
1861
1866
1869
1872

In our domestic animals, if any part, or the whole animal, be neglected and no selection be applied, that part (for instance, the comb in the Dorking fowl) or the whole breed will cease to have a nearly uniform character. 1859 1860 1861
In our domestic animals, if any part, or the whole animals, be neglected and no selection be applied, that part (for instance, the comb in the Dorking fowl) or the whole breed will cease to have a nearly uniform character. 1866
First let me remark that if any part in our domestic animals, or the whole animal, be neglected and no selection be applied, that part (for instance, the comb in the Dorking fowl) or the whole breed will cease to have a uniform character. 1869
First let me make some preliminary remarks. 1872

The 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869
If, in our domestic animals, any part or the whole animal be neglected, and no selection be applied, that part (for instance, the comb in the Dorking fowl) or the whole 1872

then be said 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869
cease 1872

degenerated. 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869
a uniform character: and the breed may be said to be degenerating. 1872

in our domestic animals those points, 1859 1860 1861 1866
those points in our domestic animals, 1869 1872

pigeon; 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869
same breed of the pigeon, and 1872

the 1859 1860 1861 1866
that of the 1869 1872

to perfection, and frequently individuals are born which depart 1859 1860 1861 1866
perfect birds, some frequently departing 1869
perfect birds, many departing 1872

further variability of all kinds, 1859 1860 1861 1866
further variability, 1869
new variations, 1872

presumption is that it is of high importance to that
species:
species;
nevertheless
it is
the part
in this case
is
is
eminently liable to variation. Why should this be so? On the view that each species has been independently created, with all its parts as we now see them, I can see no explanation. But on the view that groups of species
are
have
descended from
some other
other
species, and have been modified through natural selection, I think we can obtain some light. In our domestic animals, if any part, or the whole animal, be neglected and no selection be applied, that part (for instance, the comb in the Dorking fowl) or the whole breed will cease to have a nearly uniform character. The breed will then be said to have degenerated. In rudimentary organs, and in those which have been but little specialised for any particular purpose, and perhaps in polymorphic groups, we see a nearly parallel
natural
natural
case; for in such cases natural selection either has not or cannot
have come
come
into full play, and thus the
organization
organisation
is left in a fluctuating condition. But what here
more particularly
more especially
more especially
concerns us is, that in our domestic animals those points, which at the present time are undergoing rapid change by continued selection, are also eminently liable to variation. Look at the
individuals
breeds
of the pigeon; see what a prodigious amount of difference there is in the
beaks
beak
of
the different
the different
tumblers, in the
beaks
beak
and wattle of
the different
the different
carriers, in the carriage and tail of
our
our
fantails, &c., these being the points now mainly attended to by English fanciers. Even in
the
the
same sub-breed,
sub-breeds,
as in the short-faced
tumblers,
tumbler,
it is notoriously difficult to breed
them
them
nearly to perfection, and frequently individuals are born which depart widely from the standard. There may
truly be
be truly
said to be a constant struggle going on between, on the one hand, the tendency to reversion to a less
perfect
modified
state, as well as an innate tendency to further variability of all kinds,