See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1859
1861
1866
1869
1872

manner two parts in two organic beings, which beings owe but little of their structure in common to inheritance from the same ancestor. 1860 1861
manner two parts in two organic beings, which owe but little of their structure in common to inheritance from the same ancestor. 1859
yet some fundamental difference between them can always, or almost always, be detected. 1866 1869
yet fundamental differences between them can always be detected. 1872

10 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869; present in 1872
For instance, the eyes of cephalopods or cuttle-fish and of vertebrate animals appear wonderfully alike; and in such widely sundered groups no part of this resemblance can be due to inheritance from a common progenitor. Mr. Mivart has advanced this case as one of special difficulty, but I am unable to see the force of his argument. An organ for vision must be formed of transparent tissue, and must include some sort of lens for throwing an image at the back of a darkened chamber. Beyond this superficial resemblance, there is hardly any real similarity between the eyes of cuttle-fish and vertebrates, as may be seen by consulting Hensen's admirable memoir on these organs in the Cephalopoda. It is impossible for me here to enter on details, but I may specify a few of the points of difference. The crystalline lens in the higher cuttle-fish consists of two parts, placed one behind the other like two lenses, both having a very different structure and disposition to what occurs in the vertebrata. The retina is wholly different, with an actual inversion of the elemental parts, and with a large nervous ganglion included within the membranes of the eye. The relations of the muscles are as different as it is possible to conceive, and so in other points. Hence it is not a little difficult to decide how far even the same terms ought to be employed in describing the eyes of the Cephalopoda and Vertebrata. It is, of course, open to any one to deny that the eye in either case could have been developed through the natural selection of successive, slight variations; but if this be admitted in the one case, it is clearly possible in the other; and fundamental differences of structure in the visual organs of two groups might have been anticipated, in accordance with this view of their manner of formation.

1 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861; present in 1872 1866 1869
I am inclined to believe that in nearly the same way as two men have sometimes independently hit on the very same invention, so natural selection, working for the good of each being and taking advantage of analogous variations, has sometimes modified in very nearly the same manner two parts in two organic beings, which owe but little of their structure in common to inheritance from the same ancestor.

Although 1859 1860 1861
Finally then, although 1866 1869 1872

to the extinct and unknown 1859 1860 1861
is to the extinct and unknown, 1869 1872
OMIT 1866

is very small, 1859 1860 1861
is very small 1866
OMIT 1869 1872

I 1859 1860 1861 1869 1872
compared with the extinct and unknown forms, I 1866

The truth of this remark is indeed 1859 1860
It certainly is not true, that new organs often appear suddenly in any class, as if created for some special purpose; as indeed is 1861
It certainly is true, that new organs very rarely or never suddenly appear in any class, as if created for some special purpose; as indeed is 1866
It certainly is true, that new organs appearing as if specially created for some purpose, rarely or never appear suddenly in any class; as indeed is 1869
It certainly is true, that new organs appearing as if created for some special purpose, rarely or never appear in any being;— as indeed is 1872

but somewhat exaggerated canon 1860
canon 1859
but somewhat exaggerated, canon 1861 1866 1869 1872

so? 1859 1860 1861
so much variety and so little novelty? 1866 1869
so much variety and so little real novelty? 1872

leap, 1859 1860 1861
sudden leap, 1866 1869
great and sudden leap, 1872

the shortest and slowest 1859 1860
short and slow 1861
short and sure though slow 1866 1869
short and sure, though slow 1872

importance .— 1859 1860 1861
Importance, as affected by Natural Selection. 1866
Importance, as affected by Natural Selection. 1869
Importance, as affected by Natural Selection . 1872

individuals with any favourable variation, 1859 1860 1861 1866
the fittest, 1869 1872

those with any unfavourable deviation of structure,— I have sometimes felt much difficulty in understanding the origin of simple parts, of which the importance does not seem sufficient to cause the preservation of successively varying individuals. 1859 1860 1861
those with any unfavourable deviation of structure,—I have sometimes felt much difficulty in understanding the origin of simple parts, of which the importance does not seem sufficient to cause the preservation of successively varying individuals. 1866
the less well fitted individuals,—I have sometimes felt great difficulty in understanding the origin or formation of parts of little importance; almost as great, though of a very different kind, as in the case of the most perfect and complex organs. 1869
the less well-fitted individuals, 1872

identically the
the
same,
same
manner two parts in two organic beings, which beings owe but little of their structure in common to inheritance from the same ancestor.
Although in many cases it is most difficult
even to
to
conjecture by what transitions
an
many
....
organ
organs
could
could
have arrived at
its
their
present state; yet, considering
how small
that
the proportion of living and known forms to the extinct and unknown is very small, I have been astonished how rarely an organ can be named, towards which no transitional grade is known to lead. The truth of this remark is indeed shown by that
old,
old
but somewhat exaggerated canon in natural history of "Natura non facit saltum." We meet with this admission in the writings of almost every experienced naturalist;
or
or,
or,
as Milne Edwards has well expressed it,
nature
Nature
is prodigal in variety, but niggard in innovation. Why, on the theory of Creation, should
there
this
be so? Why should all the parts and organs of many independent beings, each supposed to have been separately created for its proper place in nature, be so
invariably
commonly
linked together by graduated steps? Why should not Nature
have
have
take
taken
a
sudden leap
leap
from structure to structure? On the theory of natural selection, we can clearly understand why she should not; for natural selection
can
can
acts
act
only by taking advantage of slight successive variations; she can never take a leap, but must advance by the shortest and slowest steps.
Organs
Organs
of
of
little
little
apparent
apparent
importance .—
As natural selection acts by life and
death,—by
death,—
by
by
the
survival
preservation
of individuals with any favourable variation, and by the destruction of those with any unfavourable deviation of structure,— I have sometimes felt much difficulty in understanding the origin of simple parts, of which the importance does not seem sufficient to cause the preservation of successively varying individuals.