See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1859
1860
1866
1869
1872

may here add, that I 1859 1860 1861 1866
OMIT 1869 1872

only briefly give 1859 1860 1861 1866
only give 1869
give only 1872

several of the 1859 1860 1861 1866
the same 1869 1872

differ 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869
of the same species differ 1872

of 1859 1860 1861 1866
belonging to 1869
belonging to other 1872

birds within 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869
with birds the individuals of 1872

country vary in a remarkably small degree, 1859 1860 1861 1866
country vary in a remark- ably small degree, 1869
species, inhabiting the same country, vary extremely little, 1872

seems to me certainly 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869
certainly seems 1872

I may here add, that I particularly attended to Mr.
Waterhouses
Waterhouse's
remark, whilst investigating this Order, and I am fully convinced that the rule almost
always
invariably
holds
good.
good
with
with
cirripedes.
cirripedes.
I shall, in
a
my
future work, give a list of
all the
the
more remarkable cases; I will here only briefly give one, as it illustrates the rule in its largest application. The opercular valves of sessile cirripedes (rock barnacles) are, in every sense of the word, very important structures, and they differ extremely little even in
distinct
different
genera; but in the several species of one genus, Pyrgoma, these valves present a marvellous amount of
diversification:
diversification;
the homologous valves in the different species being sometimes wholly unlike in shape; and the amount of variation in the individuals of several of the species is so great, that it is no exaggeration to state that the varieties differ more from each other in the characters
derived from
of
these important
organs,
valves
than do
the
other
species of distinct genera.
As birds within the same country vary in a remarkably small degree, I have particularly attended to
them;
them,
and the rule seems to me certainly to hold good in this class. I cannot make out that it applies to plants, and this would
have seriously
seriously have
shaken my belief in its truth, had not the great variability in plants made it particularly difficult to compare their relative degrees of variability.
When we see any part or organ developed in a remarkable degree or manner in
a
any
species, the fair presumption is that it is of high importance to that
species:
species;
nevertheless
it is
the part
in this case
is
is
eminently liable to variation. Why should this be so? On the view that each species has been independently created, with all its parts as we now see them, I can see no explanation. But on the view that groups of species