See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1859
1860
1866
1869
1872

To give one instance out of several which I have observed: — 1861 1866 1869 1872
for instance, 1859 1860

1 blocks not present in 1861 1866 1869 1872; present in 1859 1860
uniformly white fantails with some uniformly black barbs, and they produced mottled brown and black birds; these I again crossed together, and one grandchild of the pure white fantail and pure black barb was of as beautiful a blue colour, with the white rump, double black wing-bar, and barred and white-edged tail-feathers, as any wild rock-pigeon!

(confined, as far as I have seen, to colour alone), if 1861
if 1859 1860 1866 1869 1872

we 1859 1860 1861 1866
no instance is 1869 1872

no fact countenancing the belief that the child ever reverts to some one ancestor, 1859 1860 1861 1866
crossed descendants reverting to an ancestor of foreign blood, 1869 1872

with some distinct breed, 1859 1860 1861 1866
OMIT 1869 1872

apt suddenly to acquire these
characters;
characters.
To give one instance out of several which I have observed: — I crossed
some
....
white
some white
fantails, which breed very true, with some black barbs — and it so happens that blue varieties of barbs are so rare that I never heard of an instance in England; and the mongrels were black, brown, and mottled. I also crossed a barb with a spot, which is a white bird with a red tail and red spot on the forehead, and which notoriously breeds very true; the mongrels were dusky and mottled. I then crossed one of the mongrel barb-fantails with a mongrel barb-spot, and they produced a bird of as beautiful a blue colour, with the white
loins,
croup,
double black wing-bar, and barred and white-edged tail-feathers, as any wild rock-pigeon! We can understand these facts, on the well-known principle of reversion to ancestral
characters,
characters
(confined, as far as I have seen, to colour alone), if all the domestic breeds
are
have
descended from the rock-pigeon. But if we deny this, we must make one of the two following highly improbable suppositions. Either,
first,
firstly,
that all the several imagined aboriginal stocks were coloured and marked like the rock-pigeon, although no other existing species is thus coloured and marked, so that in each separate breed there might be a tendency to revert to the very same colours and markings. Or, secondly, that each breed, even the purest, has within a
dozen
dozen,
or,
or
at
most,
most
within a
score
score,
of generations, been crossed by the
rock-pigeon;
rock-pigeon:
I say within a dozen or twenty generations, for we
known
know
of no fact countenancing the belief that the child ever reverts to some one ancestor, removed by a greater number of generations. In a breed which has been crossed only
once,
once
with some distinct breed, the tendency to
revert
reversion
to any character derived from such
a cross
cross
will naturally become less and less, as in each succeeding generation there will be less of the foreign