| → have had a character in some degree intermediate 1859 1860 1861 |
| naturally have been more or less intermediate in character 1866 1869 1872 |
|
| → will 1859 1860 1861 |
| and they will 1866 1869 1872 |
|
|
branched off from some
ancient Marsupial, which will
→have had a character in some degree intermediate
with respect to all existing Marsupials; or that both Rodents and Marsupials branched off from a common progenitor, and that both groups have since undergone much modification in divergent directions. On either view we
suppose that the bizcacha has retained, by inheritance, more of the
of its ancient progenitor than have other Rodents; and therefore it will not be specially related to any one existing Marsupial, but indirectly to all or nearly all Marsupials, from having partially retained the character of their common progenitor, or of
early member of the group. On the other hand, of all Marsupials, as Mr. Waterhouse has remarked, the
resembles most nearly, not any one species, but the general order of Rodents. In this case, however, it may be strongly suspected that the resemblance is only analogical, owing to the
having become adapted to habits like those of a Rodent. The elder De Candolle has made nearly similar observations on the general nature of the affinities of distinct
of plants. |
|
| On the principle of the multiplication and gradual divergence in character of the species descended from a common
together with their retention by inheritance of some characters in common, we can understand the excessively complex and radiating affinities by which all the members of the same family or higher group are connected together. For the common
of a whole
now broken up by extinction into distinct groups and sub-groups, will have transmitted some of its characters, modified in various ways and degrees, to
the
→will
consequently be related to each other by
|
