See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1861
1869

why 1861 1866
an agent, why 1869

OMIT 1866 1869
flower of the 1861

parts and organs have varied 1866 1869
organs have happened to vary 1861

checked as it 1861 1866
the effects being often checked as they 1869

on the whole be 1866
be 1861 1869

to 1861 1866
on the whole to 1869

in 1861 1866
to supply force for 1869

supply force to 1861 1866
OMIT 1869

in 1861 1866
at the close of 1869

has advanced various good objections to my views, and other remarks in its favour. 1861 1866
asks, how, on the principle of natural selection, can a variety live side by side with the parent-species? 1869

6 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1866 1872; present in 1869
If both have become fitted for slightly different habits of life or conditions, they might live together; though, in the case of animals which freely cross and wander much about, varieties seem to be almost always confined to distinct localities. But if we put on one side polymorphic species, in which the variability seems to be of a peculiar nature, and all mere temporary variations, such as size, albinism, &c., the more permanent varieties are generally found, as far as I can judge, inhabiting distinct stations, high land or low land, dry or moist districts, or distinct regions. Bronn also insists that distinct species never differ from each other only in single characters, but in many parts; and he asks, how it comes that natural selection should invariably have affected simultaneously many parts of the organisation? But there is not the least necessity for believing that all the parts have been simultaneously modified; they may have been gained one after the other, and from being transmitted together, they appear to us as if simultaneously formed. Correlation, however, will account for various parts changing, when any one part changes. We have evidence of this in our domestic races, which though they may differ greatly in some one selected character, always differ to a certain extent in other characters.

had never been slowly upraised, and that the height of other mountains in other parts of the world had not recently been increased by slow degrees?
It has been objected, if natural selection be so
powerful
powerful,
why has not this or that organ been
recently
recently
modified and improved? Why has not the proboscis of the hive-bee been lengthened so as to reach the nectar
in
of
the OMIT red-clover? Why has not the ostrich acquired the power of flight? But granting that these parts and organs have varied in the right
direction,
direction—
granting that there has been time sufficient for the slow work of natural selection, checked as it will be by intercrossing and the tendency to reversion, who will pretend that he knows the
life-history
natural history
of any one organic being sufficiently well to say
whether
that
any particular change would on the whole be to its advantage? Can we feel sure that a long proboscis would not be a disadvantage to the hive-bee in sucking the innumerable small flowers which it frequents? Can we feel sure that a long proboscis would not, by
correlation,
correlation
of growth,
of growth,
almost necessarily give increased size to other parts of the mouth, perhaps interfering with the delicate cell-constructing work? In the case of the
ostrich
ostrich,
a
moments
moment's
reflection will show
what
that
an enormous supply of food would be necessary in this bird of the
desert
desert,
to supply force to move its huge body through the air. But such ill-considered objections are hardly worth notice.
The celebrated palæontologist,
Professor
Professor
Bronn, in his German translation of this work, has advanced various good objections to my views, and other remarks in its favour. Of the objections, some seem to me unimportant, some few are owing to misapprehension, and some are incidentally noticed in various parts of this volume. On the erroneous supposition that all the species of a region are believed by me to be changing