→ homes, so as to be better fitted for them than they were at first. 1866 1869 1872 |
homes. 1859 1860 1861 |
|
→ we may infer 1861 1866 1869 1872 |
I believe 1859 1860 |
|
→ bred 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
because they bred 1869 1872 |
|
→ or wild dog 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
OMIT 1872 |
|
→ living free 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
for they live 1869 1872 |
|
→ I am inclined to look at 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
OMIT 1869 1872 |
|
→ as 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
may be looked at as 1869 1872 |
|
→ as that former species 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
OMIT 1869 1872 |
|
→ were capable of enduring 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
having formerly endured 1869 1872 |
|
cases we assume such to be the case; nor do we know that they have subsequently become
to their new
→homes, so as to be better fitted for them than they were at first.
|
|
As
→we may infer
that our domestic animals were originally chosen by uncivilised man because they were useful and
→bred
readily under confinement, and not because they were subsequently found capable of far-extended transportation,
the common and extraordinary capacity in our domestic animals of not only withstanding the most different
but of being perfectly fertile (a far severer test) under them, may be used as an argument that a large proportion of other
now in a state of
could easily be brought to bear widely different climates. We must not, however, push the foregoing argument too far, on account of the probable origin of some of our domestic animals from several wild
the blood, for instance, of a tropical and arctic wolf
→or wild dog
may perhaps be mingled in our domestic breeds. The rat and mouse cannot be considered as domestic animals, but they have been transported by man to many parts of the world, and now have a far wider range than any other
→living free
under the cold climate of Faroe in the north and of the Falklands in the south, and on many
in the torrid zones. Hence
→I am inclined to look at
adaptation to any special climate
→as
a quality readily grafted on an innate wide flexibility of constitution,
common to most animals. On this view, the capacity of enduring the most different climates by man himself and by his domestic animals, and
→as that former species
of the
and rhinoceros
→were capable of enduring
a glacial climate, whereas the living species are now all tropical or sub-tropical in their habits, ought not to be looked at as anomalies, but
|