→ parents, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
ants or parents, 1869 1872 |
|
→ jaws having a 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
OMIT 1872 |
|
→ simultaneously 1859 1860 1861 1866 1872 |
at the same time 1869 |
|
→ OMIT 1866 1869 1872 |
from being the most useful to the community, 1859 1860 1861 |
|
→ OMIT 1866 |
in greater and greater numbers 1859 1860 1861 |
in greater and greater numbers, 1869 1872 |
|
→ in greater and greater numbers, until 1866 |
until 1859 1860 1861 1869 1872 |
|
→ at the same time and place 1866 |
OMIT 1869 1872 |
|
→ I have now explained how, 1866 1869 1872 |
Thus, 1859 1860 1861 |
|
and in the form and number of the teeth. But the important fact for us is,
though the workers can be grouped into castes of different sizes, yet they graduate insensibly into each other, as does the widely-different structure of their jaws. I speak confidently on this latter point, as
Lubbock made drawings for
with the camera
of the jaws which I
dissected from the workers of the several sizes. Mr. Bates, in his
interesting 'Naturalist on the Amazons,' has described
analogous cases. |
|
With these facts before me, I believe that natural selection, by acting on the fertile
→parents,
could form a species which should regularly produce neuters,
all of large size with one form of jaw, or all of small size with
→jaws having a
widely different
or lastly, and this is
climax of difficulty, one set of workers of one size and structure, and
→simultaneously
another set of workers of a different size and structure;— a graduated series having
formed, as in the case of the driver ant, and then the extreme
→OMIT
having been produced
→OMIT
through the
of the parents which generated
→in greater and greater numbers, until
none with an intermediate structure were produced. |
|
An analogous explanation has been given by Mr. Wallace, of the equally complex case, of certain Malayan
regularly appearing
→at the same time and place
under two or even three distinct female forms; and by Fritz
of certain Brazilian crustaceans likewise appearing under two widely distinct male forms. But
subject need not here be discussed. |
|
→I have now explained how,
as I believe, the wonderful fact of two distinctly defined castes of sterile workers existing in the same nest, both widely different from each other and from their parents, has originated. We
|