See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1859
1860
1861
1869
1872

in those cases in which 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869
when 1872

Many of the Species
included within
of
the Larger Genera resemble Varieties in being very closely, but unequally, related to each other, and in having restricted ranges.
There are other relations between the species of large genera and their recorded varieties which deserve notice. We have seen that there is no infallible criterion by which to distinguish species and well-marked varieties; and in those cases in which intermediate links have not been found between doubtful forms, naturalists are compelled to come to a determination by the amount of difference between them, judging by analogy whether or not the amount suffices to raise one or both to the rank of species. Hence the amount of difference is one very important criterion in settling whether two forms should be ranked as species or varieties. Now Fries has remarked in regard to plants, and Westwood in regard to insects, that in large genera the amount of difference between the species is often exceedingly
small,
small.
I have endeavoured to test this numerically by averages, and, as far as my imperfect results go, they
always
....
confirm the view. I have also consulted some sagacious and
most
....
experienced observers, and, after deliberation, they concur in this view. In this respect, therefore, the species of the larger
genera
genera,
resemble varieties, more than do the species of the smaller genera. Or the case may be put in another way, and it may be said, that in the larger genera, in which a number of varieties or incipient species greater than the average are now manufacturing, many of the species already manufactured still to a certain extent resemble varieties, for they differ from each other by
a
a
less than
usual
the usual
amount of difference.
Moreover, the species of the
larger
large
genera are related to each other, in the same manner as the varieties of any one species are related to each other. No
naturalist
natu- ralist