| → male-ass with a mare: 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
| mare by a male-ass; 1872 |
|
| → whole organisation, except in their reproductive systems. 1866 1869 |
| whole organisation. 1859 1860 1861 |
| structure or constitution, excepting in their reproductive systems. 1872 |
|
| ↑ 2 blocks not present in 1866 1869 1872; present in 1859 1860 1861 |
| On the other hand, these cases clearly show that the capacity for crossing is connected with constitutional differences imperceptible by us, and confined to the reproductive system.
This difference in the result of reciprocal crosses between the same two species was long ago observed by Kölreuter.
|
|
|
general appearance, and having strongly marked
in every part of the flower, even in the pollen, in the fruit, and in the cotyledons, can be crossed. Annual and perennial plants, deciduous and evergreen trees, plants inhabiting different stations and fitted for extremely different climates, can often be crossed with ease. |
|
| By a reciprocal cross between two species, I mean the case, for instance, of a
being first crossed
a
and then a
→male-ass with a mare:
these two species may then be said to have been reciprocally crossed. There is often the widest possible difference in the facility of making reciprocal crosses. Such cases are highly important, for they prove that the capacity in any two species to cross is often completely independent of their systematic affinity,
of any
difference in their
→whole organisation, except in their reproductive systems. The diversity of
in reciprocal crosses between the same two species was long ago observed by Kölreuter. ↑ To give an instance: Mirabilis
can easily be fertilised by the pollen of M. longiflora, and the hybrids thus produced are sufficiently fertile; but Kölreuter tried more than two hundred times, during eight following years, to fertilise reciprocally M. longiflora with the pollen of M.
and utterly failed. Several other equally striking cases could be given. Thuret has observed the same fact with certain sea-weeds or Fuci. Gärtner, moreover, found that this difference of facility in making reciprocal crosses is extremely common in a lesser degree. He has observed it even between
closely related
Matthiola annua and glabra)
many botanists rank
only as varieties. It is also a remarkable fact, that hybrids raised from reciprocal crosses, though of course compounded of the very same two species, the
|
