| → With 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
| We may safely infer that with 1872 |
|
| → we may safely infer 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
| there has been 1872 |
|
| → and on the great 1869 1872 |
| on the prodigious 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
|
have concluded that the average duration of each formation is twice or thrice as long as the average duration of specific forms. But insuperable difficulties, as it seems to me, prevent us
to any just conclusion on this head. When we see a species first appearing in the middle of any formation, it would be rash in the extreme to infer that it had not elsewhere previously existed. So again when we find a species disappearing before the
layers have been deposited, it would be equally rash to suppose that it then became
extinct. We forget how small the area of Europe is compared with the rest of the world; nor have the several stages of the same formation throughout Europe been correlated with perfect accuracy. |
|
|
→With
marine animals of all
→we may safely infer
a large amount of migration
climatal and other changes; and when we see a species first appearing in any formation, the probability is that it only then first immigrated into that area. It is
for instance, that several species appeared
earlier in the palæozoic beds of North America than in those of Europe; time having apparently been required for their migration from the American to the European seas. In examining the latest deposits
various quarters of the world, it has everywhere been noted, that some few still existing species are common in the deposit, but have become extinct in the immediately surrounding sea; or, conversely, that some are now abundant in the neighbouring sea, but are rare or absent in this particular deposit. It is an excellent lesson to reflect on the ascertained amount of migration of the inhabitants of Europe during the
which forms only a part of one whole geological
and likewise to reflect on the
changes of level, on the
change of climate,
→and on the great
lapse
|
