See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1872

respects. 1866 1869 1872
points of structure. 1859 1860 1861

be compelled to 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869
OMIT 1872

believe that the great majority of naturalists are wrong and that the 1861 1869
believe that the great majority of naturalists are wrong and that that the 1866
admit, in opposition to the judgment of most naturalists, that these 1872

the frequent occurrence of 1869 1872
a very general 1861
frequent occurrence of 1866

of time, namely, 1861 1866 1869 1872
namely, 1859 1860

so that here again we have undoubted evidence of change 1869 1872
but to this subject I shall have to return 1859 1860
so that here again we have undoubted evidence of change, though not strictly of variation, 1861 1866

in all respects. So that we might obtain the parent-species and its several modified descendants from the lower and upper beds of
a
the same
formation, and unless we obtained numerous transitional gradations, we should not recognise their
relationship,
blood-relationship,
and should consequently be compelled to rank them
all
....
as distinct species.
It is notorious on what excessively slight differences many palæontologists have founded their species; and they do this the more readily if the specimens come from different sub-stages of the same formation. Some experienced conchologists are now sinking many of the very fine species of
D'Orbigny
D''Orbigny
and others into the rank of varieties; and on this view we do find the kind of evidence of change which on
my
the
theory we ought to find. Look again at the later tertiary deposits, which include many shells believed by the majority of naturalists to be identical with existing species; but some excellent naturalists, as Agassiz and Pictet, maintain that all these tertiary species are specifically distinct, though the distinction is admitted to be very slight; so that here, unless we believe that these eminent naturalists have been misled by their
imaginations
imaginations,
and that these late tertiary species really present no difference whatever from their living representatives, or unless we believe that the great majority of naturalists are wrong and that the tertiary species are all truly distinct from the recent, we have evidence of the frequent occurrence of slight
modification
modifications
of
form of
....
the kind required.
Moreover, if
If
we look to rather wider
intervals,
intervals
of time, namely, to distinct but consecutive stages of the same great formation, we find that the embedded fossils, though
almost
almost
universally ranked as specifically different, yet are far more closely
allied
related
to each other than are the species found in more widely separated formations; so that here again we have undoubted evidence of change