↑ 1 blocks not present in 1869 1872; present in 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
In regard to the Invertebrata, Barrande, and a higher authority could not be named, asserts that he is every day taught that
palæozoic animals, though belonging to the same orders, families, or genera with those living at the present day,
were not at this early epoch limited in such distinct groups
as they now
are.
|
|
→ living 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
any two living 1872 |
|
→ groups. 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
groups of species. 1872 |
|
→ the 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
or groups, the 1872 |
|
→ OMIT 1869 1872 |
I apprehend that 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
→ certainly 1869 1872 |
would have to 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
→ OMIT 1869 1872 |
from each other 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
→ are separated 1869 1872 |
of the same two groups would be distinguished 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
→ quite distinct, made at that period a somewhat nearer 1869 |
quite distinct, at that period made some small 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
made a somewhat nearer 1872 |
|
→ other. 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
other than they now do. 1872 |
|
Huxley to be partially bridged over in the most unexpected manner, by, on the one hand, the ostrich and extinct Archeopteryx, and on the other hand, the Compsognathus, one of the Dinosaurians— that group which includes the most gigantic of all terrestrial reptiles. Turning to the Invertebrata, Barrande asserts, and a higher authority could not be named, that he is every day taught that, although palæozoic animals can certainly be classed under existing groups, yet that at this ancient period the groups were not so distinctly separated from each other as they now are. ↑ |
|
Some writers have objected to any extinct
or group of
being considered as intermediate between
→living
or
→groups. If by this term it is meant that an extinct form is directly intermediate in all its characters between two living
→the
objection is
valid. But
→OMIT
in a
natural classification many fossil species
→certainly
stand between living species, and some extinct genera between living genera, even between genera belonging to distinct families. The most common case, especially with respect to very distinct groups, such as fish and reptiles, seems to be,
supposing them to be distinguished at the present day
→OMIT
by a
characters, the ancient members
→are separated
by a somewhat lesser number of
so that the two
formerly
→quite distinct, made at that period a somewhat nearer
approach to each
→other.
|
|
It is a common belief that the more ancient a form is, by so much the more it tends to connect by some of its characters groups now widely separated from each other. This remark no doubt must be restricted to those groups which have undergone much change in the course of geological ages; and it would be difficult to prove the truth of the proposition, for every now and then even a living animal, as the Lepidosiren, is
|