→ forms having 1869 |
parent-forms having occasionally 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
forms have 1872 |
|
→ constitute 1869 |
will give to us 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
these constitute 1872 |
|
→ OMIT 1869 1872 |
on my theory 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
→ by 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
as at present by 1872 |
|
→ or by one or two. 1869 |
but such richness in species, as I find after some investigation, does not commonly fall to the lot of aberrant genera. 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
or by two or three. 1872 |
|
→ forms which have been 1869 1872 |
failing groups 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
→ still preserved under unusually favourable conditions. 1869 1872 |
preserved by some unusual coincidence of favourable circumstances. 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
→ OMIT 1869 1872 |
of the bizcacha to Marsupials 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
→ must be due in accordance with our view 1869 1872 |
are due on my theory 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
→ from a common progenitor. 1869 1872 |
in common. 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
|
→ naturally have been more or less intermediate in character 1866 1869 1872 |
have had a character in some degree intermediate 1859 1860 1861 |
|
and intermediate
→forms having
transmitted to the present day descendants but little modified,
→constitute
our so-called osculant or aberrant
The more aberrant any form is, the greater must be the number of connecting forms which
→OMIT
have been exterminated and utterly lost. And we have some evidence of aberrant
having suffered severely from extinction, for they are
represented by extremely few species; and such species as do occur are generally very distinct from each other, which again implies extinction. The genera Ornithorhynchus and Lepidosiren, for example, would not have been less aberrant had each been represented by a dozen
instead of
→by
a single
→or by one or two. We can, I think, account for this fact only by looking at aberrant
as
→forms which have been
conquered by more successful competitors, with a few members
→still preserved under unusually favourable conditions.
|
|
Mr. Waterhouse has remarked that, when a member belonging to one group of animals exhibits an affinity to a quite distinct group, this affinity in most cases is general and not special: thus, according to Mr. Waterhouse, of all Rodents, the bizcacha is most nearly related to Marsupials; but in the points in which it approaches this order, its relations are general, and not to any one marsupial species more than to another. As
points of affinity
→OMIT
are believed to be real and not merely adaptive, they
→must be due in accordance with our view
to inheritance
→from a common progenitor. Therefore we must suppose either that all Rodents, including the
branched off from some
ancient Marsupial, which will
→naturally have been more or less intermediate in character
with respect to all existing Marsupials; or that both Rodents and Marsupials branched off from a common progenitor, and that both groups have since
|