| → OMIT 1869 1872 |
| A difficulty, diametrically opposite to this which we have just been considering, has been advanced, namely, 1861 1866 |
|
| → it has been asked, could 1869 1872 |
| could 1861 1866 |
|
| → the advancement or differentiation 1869 1872 |
| advancement or in the differentiation and specialisation 1861 1866 |
|
| ↑ 1 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1866 1869 1872; present in 1861 |
| I can make no sufficient answer; and can only say that as we have no facts to guide us, all speculation on the subject would be baseless and useless.
|
|
| → OMIT 1869 1872 |
| would come into action, namely, 1866 |
|
| → different" would come into action. 1869 1872 |
| different." 1866 |
|
| → thus 1869 1872 |
| through their preservation either 1861 |
| through their preservation, either 1866 |
|
| → as I remarked 1866 1869 1872 |
| I must recur to what was stated 1861 |
|
| → OMIT 1866 1869 1872 |
| where I say that 1861 |
|
| → we make due allowance 1869 1872 |
| due allowance be made 1861 1866 |
|
| → present time, and still more so during past ages. 1872 |
| many past epochs in its history. 1861 1866 |
| past epochs in its history. 1869 |
|
| ←Subtitle not present 1859 1860 1861 1872
Various
Objections
considered.
1866 1869 |
| → OMIT 1872 |
| I need allude only to two other objections: a distinguished botanist, 1869 |
|
| → If 1872 |
| I will only remark that if 1869 |
|
| → belonging to two distinct though 1872 |
| of two 1869 |
|
| → forms, it is conceivable that these might 1872 |
| species, I can believe that they might sometimes 1869 |
|
| → have all to 1872 |
| for convenience sake 1869 |
|
| → the descendants of two distinct 1872 |
| two 1869 |
|