See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869

possessors, and may never have been of any use to their progenitors; but this does not prove that they were formed solely for beauty or variety. 1872
possessors. 1859 1860 1861 1866
possessors, and may never have been of any use to their progenitors. 1869

OMIT 1872
as recently remarked, 1869

and the various causes of modifications, lately specified, 1872
correlated variation, and reversion 1869

effect, probably a great effect, independently of any advantage thus gained. 1872
effects. 1869

a still more 1872
the most 1869

very close and direct 1872
direct 1869

3 blocks not present in 1869 1872; present in 1859 1860 1861 1866
Physical conditions probably have had some little effect on structure, quite independently of any good thus gained. Correlation of growth has no doubt played a most important part, and a useful modification of one part will often have entailed on other parts diversified changes of no direct use. So again characters which formerly were useful, or which formerly had arisen from correlation of growth, or from other unknown cause, may reappear from the law of reversion, though now of no direct use.

1 blocks not present in 1866 1869 1872; present in 1859 1860 1861
The effects of sexual selection, when displayed in beauty to charm the females, can be called useful only in rather a forced sense.

fore-leg 1860 1861 1866 1869 1872
fore leg of 1859

webbed feet no doubt were as useful to 1872
to 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869

OMIT 1872
webbed feet no doubt were as useful 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869

were originally developed, on the principle of utility, probably through the reduction 1872
which have been inherited from a common progenitor, were formerly 1859 1860 1861 1866
which have been in- herited from some ancient progenitor, were formerly 1869

numerous bones in the fin of some ancient fish-like progenitor of the whole class. 1872
special use to that progenitor, or its progenitors, than they now are to these animals having such widely diversified habits. 1859 1860 1861 1866
special use than they now are to these animals with their widely diversified habits, and might consequently have been modified through natural selection. 1869

is 1872
may safely be accepted as true, and as 1866 1869

OMIT 1872
of any particular object 1866
of any object 1869

of what is beautiful, is not innate or unalterable. 1872
is not an innate and unalterable element in the mind. 1866 1869

for instance, in the 1872
in 1866 1869

This
Such
doctrine,
doctrines,
if true, would be absolutely fatal to my theory.
Yet
....
I fully admit that many structures are
of
now of
no direct use to their possessors, and may never have been of any use to their progenitors; but this does not prove that they were formed solely for beauty or variety. No
doubt,
doubt
OMIT the definite action of changed conditions, and the various causes of modifications, lately specified, have all produced
their
an
effect, probably a great effect, independently of any advantage thus gained. But a still more important consideration is that the chief part of the organisation of every living creature is
simply
....
due to inheritance; and consequently, though each
assuredly
being assuredly
is well fitted for its place in nature, many structures
now have
have now
no very close and direct relation to
existing
present
habits of life. Thus, we can hardly believe that the webbed feet of the upland goose or of the frigate-bird are of special use to these birds; we cannot believe that the
same
similar
bones in the arm of the monkey, in the fore-leg
the
of the
horse, in the wing of the bat, and in the flipper of the seal, are of special use to these animals. We may safely attribute these structures to inheritance. But webbed feet no doubt were as useful to the progenitor of the upland goose and of the frigate-bird, OMIT as they now are to the most aquatic of
existing
living
birds. So we may believe that the progenitor of the seal
had
did
not
a
possess a
flipper, but a foot with five toes fitted for walking or grasping; and we may further venture to believe that the several bones in the limbs of the monkey, horse, and bat, were originally developed, on the principle of utility, probably through the reduction of more numerous bones in the fin of some ancient fish-like progenitor of the whole class. It is scarcely possible to decide how much allowance ought to be made for such causes of change, as the definite action of external conditions, so-called spontaneous variations, and the complex laws of growth; but with these important exceptions, we may conclude that the structure of every living creature either now is, or was formerly, of some direct or indirect use to its possessor.
With respect to the
view
belief
that organic beings have been created beautiful for the delight of
man,—a
man,—
view
a belief
which it has
lately
....
been pronounced is subversive of my whole
theory,—I
theory,—
may
I may
first remark that the
idea
sense
of
the
....
beauty OMIT obviously depends on the
mind
nature
of
man,
the mind,
irrespective of any real quality in the admired object; and that the idea of what is beautiful, is not innate or unalterable. We see
this
this,
for instance, in the men of different races admiring an entirely different standard of beauty in their
women;
women.
neither
....
the
....
Negro
....
nor
....
the
....
Chinese
....
admires
....
the
....
Caucasian
....
beau-ideal.
....
If beautiful objects had been created solely for man's gratification, it ought to