See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869

and 1861 1866 1869 1872
differs remarkably; as does 1859 1860

disposition, differ remarkably. 1861 1869 1872
disposition. 1859 1860
disposition, differ re- markably. 1866

in this case place 1872
place 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869

would call 1872
might have called 1859 1860 1861
would have called 1866 1869

are the differences 1872
the differences are 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869

they did not breed 1872
not breeding 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869

of the eggs vary. The manner of
flight
flight,
and in some breeds the voice and disposition, differ remarkably. Lastly, in certain breeds, the males and females have come to differ
to
in
a slight degree from each other.
Altogether at least a score of pigeons might be chosen,
which
which,
if shown to an ornithologist, and he were told that they were wild birds, would
certainly,
certainly
I think,
....
be ranked by him as well-defined species. Moreover, I do not believe that any ornithologist would in this case place the English carrier, the short-faced tumbler, the runt, the barb, pouter, and fantail in the same genus; more especially as in each of these breeds several truly-inherited sub-breeds, or
species
species,
as he would call them, could be shown him.
Great as are the differences between the breeds of
pigeons,
the pigeon,
I am fully convinced that the common opinion of naturalists is correct, namely, that all
have
are
descended from the rock-pigeon (Columba livia), including under this term several geographical races or sub-species, which differ from each other in the most trifling respects. As several of the reasons which have led me to this belief are in some degree applicable in other cases, I will here briefly give them. If the several breeds are not varieties, and have not proceeded from the rock-pigeon, they must have descended from at least seven or eight aboriginal stocks; for it is impossible to make the present domestic breeds by the crossing of any lesser number: how, for instance, could a pouter be produced by crossing two breeds unless one of the parent-stocks possessed the characteristic enormous crop? The supposed aboriginal stocks must all have been rock-pigeons, that is, they did not breed or willingly
perching
perch
on trees. But besides C. livia, with its geographical sub-species, only two or three other species of rock-pigeons are known; and these have not any of the characters of the domestic breeds. Hence the supposed aboriginal stocks must either still exist in the countries where they were originally domesticated, and yet be unknown to ornithologists; and this, considering their size, habits, and remarkable characters, seems
very
....
improbable; or they must have become extinct in the wild state. But birds breeding on precipices, and good fliers, are unlikely to be exterminated; and the common rock-pigeon, which has the same habits with the domestic breeds, has not been exterminated even on several of the smaller British islets, or on the shores of the Mediterranean. Hence the supposed extermination of so many species having similar habits with the rock-pigeon seems
to me
to be
....
a very rash assumption. Moreover, the several above-named domesticated breeds have been transported to all parts of the world, and, therefore, some of them must have been carried back