|
Having found a female tree exactly sixty yards from a male tree, I put the stigmas of twenty flowers, taken from different branches, under the microscope, and on all, without exception, there were
→a few pollen grains,
and on some a
As the wind had set for several days from the female to the male tree, the pollen could not thus have been carried. The weather had been cold and boisterous, and therefore not favourable to bees, nevertheless every female flower which I examined had been effectually fertilised by the bees,
→which had
flown from tree to tree in search of nectar. But to return to our imaginary case: as soon as the plant had been rendered so highly attractive to insects that pollen was regularly carried from flower to flower, another process might commence. No naturalist doubts the advantage of what has been called the "physiological division of labour;" hence we may believe that it would be advantageous to a plant to produce stamens alone in one flower or on one whole plant, and pistils alone in another flower or on another plant. In plants under culture and placed under new conditions of life, sometimes the male organs and sometimes the female organs become more or less impotent; now if we suppose this to occur in ever so slight a degree under nature,
as pollen is already carried regularly from flower to flower, and as a more complete separation of the sexes of our plant would be advantageous on the principle of the division of labour, individuals with this tendency more and more increased, would be continually favoured or selected, until at last a complete separation of the sexes
be effected. It would take up too much space to show the various steps, through dimorphism and other means, by which the separation of the sexes in plants of various kinds is apparently now in progress; but I may add that some of the species of holly in North
are, according to Asa Gray, in an
condition, or, as he expresses
→it,
are more or less diœciously polygamous. |
| Let us now turn to the nectar-feeding
→OMIT
we may suppose the
of which we have been slowly increasing the nectar by continued selection, to be a common plant; and that certain insects depended in main part on its nectar for food. I could give many
showing how anxious bees are to save
for instance, their habit of cutting holes and sucking the nectar at the bases of certain flowers, which
→with a very little more trouble, they can
enter by the mouth. Bearing such facts in mind,
→it may be believed that under certain circumstances individual differences
in the
→curvature or length
of the
→OMIT
proboscis, &c.,
too slight to be appreciated by us, might profit a bee or other insect, so that
|
