piece of ground, could live on it (supposing
not to be in any way
→OMIT
and may be said to be striving to the utmost to live there; but, it is seen, that where they come into the closest
→OMIT
the advantages of diversification of structure, with the accompanying differences of habit and constitution, determine that the inhabitants, which thus jostle each other most closely, shall, as a general rule, belong to what we call different genera and orders. |
|
The same principle is seen in the naturalisation of plants through
agency in foreign lands. It might have been expected that the plants which
in becoming naturalised in any land would generally have been closely allied to the indigenes; for these are commonly looked at as specially created and adapted for their own country. It
also,
have been expected that naturalised plants would have belonged to a few groups more especially adapted to certain stations in their new homes. But the case is very different; and Alph.
Candolle has well
in his great and admirable work, that floras gain by naturalisation, proportionally with the number of the native genera and species, far more in new genera than in new species. To give a single instance: in the last edition of Dr. Asa
of the Flora of the Northern United
260 naturalised plants are enumerated, and these belong to 162 genera. We thus see that these naturalised plants are of a highly diversified nature. They differ, moreover, to a large
from the indigenes, for out of the 162
no less than 100 genera are not there indigenous, and thus a large proportional addition is made to the
→genera now living in the United
States. |
|
By considering the nature of the plants or animals which have
→in any country struggled
successfully with the
→OMIT
and have there become naturalised, we
gain some crude idea in what manner some of the natives would have
to be modified, in order to
an advantage over
and we
at least
infer that diversification of structure, amounting to new generic differences, would
profitable to them. |
|
The advantage of diversification
→of structure in
the inhabitants of the same region is, in fact, the same as that of the physiological division of
in the organs of the same individual body— a subject so well elucidated by Milne Edwards. No physiologist doubts that a stomach
adapted to digest vegetable matter alone, or flesh alone, draws most nutriment from these substances. So in the general economy of any land, the more widely and perfectly the animals and plants are diversified for different habits of life, so will
|