of our domestic animals is, that we find in the most ancient records, more especially
on the monuments of Egypt, much diversity
in the breeds; and that some of
the breeds
closely resemble, perhaps are
identical with,
those still existing. ↑3 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861; present in 1866 1869 1872 | But this only throws far backwards the history of civilization,
and shows that animals were domesticated at a much earlier period than has hitherto been supposed.
The lake-inhabitants of Switzerland cultivated several kinds of wheat and barley, the pea, the poppy for oil, and flax; and they possessed several domesticated animals;
they
had
also commerce
with other nations.
All this clearly shows, as Heer has remarked, that they had at this early age progressed considerably in civilization;
and this again implies a long-continued
previous period of less advanced civilization,
during which the domesticated animals, kept by the
different tribes and
in different districts, might have varied and given rise to distinct races.
|
↑1 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1866; present in 1869 1872 | Since the discovery of flint tools or celts
in the superficial formations in
many parts of the world, all geologists believe that barbarian man existed at an enormously remote period; and we know that at the present day there is hardly a tribe so barbarous
as not to have domesticated at least the dog.
|
Even if this latter fact were found more strictly and generally true than seems to me to be the case, what does it show, but that some of our breeds originated there, four or five thousand years ago? But Mr. Horner's researches have rendered it in some degree probable that man sufficiently civilized to have manufactured pottery existed in the valley of the Nile thirteen or fourteen thousand years ago; and who will pretend to say how long before these ancient periods, savages, like those of Tierra del Fuego or Australia, who possess a semi-domestic dog, may not have existed in Egypt? ↑1 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1869 1872; present in 1861 1866 | Since the recent
discoveries
of flint tools or celts in the superficial deposits
of France and England, few
geologists will doubt
that man,
in a sufficiently civilized state to have manufactured weapons,
existed at a period extremely remote as measured by years;
and we know that at the present day there is hardly a tribe so barbarous as not to have domesticated at least the dog.
|
|
The whole subject must, I think, remain vague;
nevertheless, nevertheless, 1860 | neverthelsss, 1859 |
I may, without here entering on any details, state that, from geographical and other considerations, I think it highly probable that our domestic dogs have descended from several wild species. Knowing, as we do, that savages are very fond of taming animals, it seems to me unlikely, in the case of the dog-genus, which is distributed in a wild state throughout the world, that since man first appeared one single species alone should have been domesticated. ↑2 blocks not present in 1859 1860; present in 1861 1866 1869 1872 | The origin of most of our domestic animals will probably for ever remain vague.
But I may here state, that
looking to the domestic dogs of the whole world, I have, after a laborious collection of all known facts, come to the conclusion that several wild species of Canidæ have been tamed, and that their blood, more or less mingled,
flows
in the veins of our many
domestic breeds.
|
In regard to sheep and goats I can form no opinion. I should think,
from
facts communicated to me by Mr. Blyth, on the habits, voice, and
constitution, &c.,
of the humped Indian cattle, that these had
descended from a different aboriginal stock from our European cattle; and several
competent judges believe that these latter have had more than one wild parent.
↑1 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861; present in 1866 1869 1872 | This conclusion, as well as the
specific distinction between the humped and common cattle, may
indeed
be looked at
as almost
established by the recent
admirable researches of Professor Rütimeyer.
|
With respect to horses, from reasons which I cannot give here,
I am doubtfully
inclined to believe, in opposition to several authors, that all the races have descended from one wild stock. Mr. Blyth, whose opinion, from his large and varied stores of knowledge, I should value more than that of almost any one, thinks that all the breeds of poultry have proceeded from the common wild
|