Comparison with 1866 |
|
generated.
I may add that, according to Dr. Gray and some other observers, the European cuckoo has not utterly lost all maternal love and care for her own offspring. I may add that, according to Dr. Gray and some other observers, the European cuckoo has not utterly lost all maternal love and care for her own offspring. 1866 |
I may add that, according to Dr. Gray and to some other observers, the European cuckoo has not utterly lost all maternal love and care for her own offspring. 1859 1860 1861 |
It has, also, recently been ascertained that the cuckoo occasionally lays her eggs on the bare ground, sits on them and feeds her young; this rare and strange event evidently is a case of reversion to the long-lost aboriginal instinct of nidification. 1869 |
↑2 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869; present in 1872 | It has, also, recently been ascertained on sufficient evidence, by Adolf Müller, that the cuckoo occasionally lays her eggs on the bare ground, sits on them, and feeds her young.
This rare event is probably a case of reversion to the long-lost, aboriginal instinct of nidification.
|
|
|
It has been objected by some authors
that I have not noticed other related instincts and points of structure
in the cuckoo, which are falsely
spoken of as necessarily co-ordinated. But in all cases, speculation on any
instinct or character known in only
a single species, is useless, for we have no
facts to guide us. Until quite
recently the instincts of the European and of the non-parasitic American cuckoo alone were known; now, owing to Mr. E.
Ramsay's
observations, we know
something about three Australian species, which lay their eggs in other birds'
nests. The chief points referred to
are three: firstly,
that the cuckoo,
with rare exceptions, lays only one egg in a nest, so that the large and voracious young cuckoo
receives
ample food. Secondly, that the egg
is so
remarkably small,
that it does
not exceed in
size that
of the skylark,—a bird not more than one-fourth of the size of
the cuckoo;
that
this
is a real case of adaptation we may infer from the fact of the non-parasitic American cuckoo laying eggs of full size proportionally with her body. Thirdly
and lastly,
that the young cuckoo, soon after birth, has the instinct, the strength, and a properly shaped back for ejecting its foster-brothers, which then perish from cold and hunger. This,
it
has been boldly maintained, is beneficently designed,
in order that the young cuckoo may get sufficient food, and that its foster-brothers may perish,
before,
as it is supposed, they have
acquired much feeling!
|
|
Turning now to the Australian species; though these birds generally lay only one egg in a nest, it is not rare to find two and even three eggs of
the same species of cuckoo in the same
nest.
In the Bronze cuckoo the eggs vary greatly in size, from eight to ten lines in length. Now if it had been of any
advantage to this species to have laid eggs even smaller than those now laid
by her,
so as to have deceived certain foster-parents, or, as is more probable, to have been hatched within some
shorter period (for it is asserted that there is a relation between the
size of eggs
and the period of incubation),
then there is no difficulty in believing that a race or species might have been formed which would have laid smaller and smaller eggs; for these would have been more safely hatched and reared. Mr. Ramsay remarks that two of the Australian cuckoos, when they lay their eggs in an open or not domed
nest, manifest a decided preference for nests containing eggs similar to
their own. The European species certainly
manifests some tendency towards a similar instinct, but not rarely departs from it, as is shown by her laying her dull and pale-coloured eggs in the nest of the Hedge-warbler with its
bright greenish-blue eggs:
had she
invariably displayed the above instinct, it would assuredly have been added to those which it is assumed must all have been acquired together. The eggs of the Australian Bronze cuckoo vary, according to Mr. Ramsay, in
an extraordinary manner
in colour; so that in this respect, as well as in size, natural selection assuredly
might have secured and fixed any advantageous variation. ↑3 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869; present in 1872 | In the case of the European cuckoo, the offspring of the foster-parents are commonly ejected from the nest within three days after the cuckoo is hatched; and as the latter at this age is in a most helpless condition, Mr. Gould was formerly inclined to believe that the act of ejection was performed by the foster-parents themselves.
But he has now received a trustworthy account of a young cuckoo which was actually seen, whilst still blind and not able even to hold up its own head, in the act of ejecting its foster-brothers.
One of these was replaced in the nest by the observer, and was again thrown out.
|
|
With respect
to the last point insisted on—namely, of the
young European cuckoo ejecting its fosterbrothers—it
must first be remarked that Mr. Gould, who has paid particular attention to this subject, is convinced that the belief is an error; he asserts that the young foster-birds are generally ejected during the first three days, when the young cuckoo is quite power less;
he maintains that the young cuckoo exerts, by its hunger-cries, or by some other means, such a fascination over its foster-parents, that it alone receives food, so that the others are starved to death, and are then thrown out, like the egg-shells or the excrement, by the old birds. He admits, however, that the young cuckoo when grown older and stronger may have the power,
and perhaps the instinct, of ejecting its foster-brothers, if they happen to escape starvation during the first few days after birth. Mr. Ramsay has arrived at a similar conclusion with respect to
the Australian species,
which
he especially observed: he
states that the young cuckoo is at first a little helpless fat creature, but, "as it grows rapidly, it soon fills up the greater part of the nest, and its unfortunate companions, either smothered by its weight, or starved to death through its greediness, are thrown out by their parents." Now, if it had been of great importance
to the young cuckoo to have received as much food as possible during the first few days after birth, I can see no especial difficulty,
if it possessed sufficient strength,
in its gradually
acquiring,
during successive generations, the habit (first, perhaps, through mere unintentional restlessness) and the structure best fitted for ejecting its foster-brothers;
for those young cuckoos which had such habits and structure would have been the best fed and
most securely reared. ↑1 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869; present in 1872 | The first step towards the acquisition of the proper instinct might have been mere unintentional restlessness on the part of the young bird, when somewhat advanced in age and strength; the habit having been afterwards improved, and transmitted to an earlier age.
|
I can see no more difficulty in this, than in young
birds acquiring the instinct and the temporary hard tips to their beaks for breaking
through their own shells;—or than in the
young snake
having
in its
upper jaw,
as Owen has remarked, a transitory sharp tooth for cutting through the tough egg-shell. For if each part is liable to variation at any
age,
and the variations tend to be inherited at a corresponding age,—propositions
which cannot,
as we shall hereafter see, rightfully
be disputed,—then
the
instincts
and structure of the young can
be slowly modified as well
as those of the adult,
and both cases must stand or fall together
with the whole theory of natural selection. |
|
The occasional habit of birds laying
their eggs in
other birds' nests, either of the same or of distinct species, other birds' nests, either of the same or of distinct species, 1866 |
other birds' nests, either of the same or of a distinct species, 1859 1861 |
other birds nests, either of the same or of a distinct species, 1860 |
other birds nests, either of the same or of distinct species, 1869 |
the nests of other birds. This habit 1872 |
is not very uncommon with the Gallinaceæ;
and this perhaps explains the origin of a
singular instinct in
the allied group of
ostriches.
For several hen ostriches For several hen ostriches 1866 1869 |
For several hen ostriches, at least in the case of the American species, 1859 1860 1861 |
In this family several hen-birds 1872 |
unite and lay first a few eggs in one nest and then in another; and these are hatched by the males. This instinct may probably be accounted for by the fact of the
here here 1866 | hens 1859 1860 1861 1869 1872 |
laying a large number of
eggs, eggs, 1866 1869 1872 | eggs; 1859 1860 1861 |
but, as in
the case of the
cuckoo, at intervals of two or three days. This
instinct, however, of the American ostrich
has
not as yet been perfected; for a surprising number of eggs lie strewed over the plains, so that in one day's
hunting I picked up no less than twenty lost and wasted eggs. |
|
Many bees are parasitic, and always
lay their eggs in the nests of bees of
other kinds. This case is more remarkable than that of the cuckoo; for these bees have not only their
instincts but their structure modified in accordance with their parasitic habits; for they do not possess the pollen-collecting apparatus which would be necessary
if they had to
store
food
for their own young. Some species,
likewise, of Sphegidæ (wasp-like insects) are
parasitic
on other species;
and M. Fabre has lately shown good reason for believing
that, that, 1866 1869 1872 | that 1859 1860 1861 |
although the Tachytes nigra generally makes its own burrow and stores it with paralysed prey for its own larvæ
to feed on,
yet
that, that, 1866 1869 1872 | that 1859 1860 1861 |
when this insect finds a burrow already made and stored by another sphex, it takes advantage of the prize, and becomes for the occasion parasitic. In this case, as with the supposed case
of the cuckoo,
I can
|