| Comparison with 1866 |
|
the same class or order
are compared
together: | together: 1866 1869 1872 |
| one with another: 1859 1860 1861 |
| thus, 1861 1866 1869 1872 | | thus 1859 1860 |
| 15 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869; present in 1872 | | Numerous cases could be given of striking resemblances in quite distinct beings between single parts or organs, which have been adapted for the same functions.
A good instance is afforded by the close resemblance of the jaws of the dog and Tasmanian wolf or Thylacinus,— animals which are widely sundered in the natural system. But this resemblance is confined to general appearance, as in the prominence of the canines, and in the cutting shape of the molar teeth.
For the teeth really differ much: thus the dog has on each side of the upper jaw four pre-molars and only two molars; whilst the Thylacinus has three pre-molars and four molars.
The molars also differ much in the two animals in relative size and structure.
The adult dentition is preceded by a widely different milk dentition.
Any one may of course deny that the teeth in either case have been adapted for tearing flesh, through the natural selection of successive variations; but if this be admitted in the one case, it is unintelligible to me that it should be denied in the other.
I am glad to find that so high an authority as Professor Flower has come to this same conclusion.
The extraordinary cases given in a former chapter, of widely different fishes possessing electric organs,— of widely different insects possessing luminous organs,— and of orchids and asclepiads having pollen-masses with viscid discs, come under this same head of analogical resemblances.
But these cases are so wonderful that they were introduced as difficulties or objections to our theory.
In all such cases some fundamental difference in the growth or development of the parts, and generally in their matured structure, can be detected. The end gained is the same, but the means, though appearing superficially to be the same, are essentially different.
The principle formerly alluded to under the term of
analogical
variation
has probably in these cases often come into play that is, the members of the same class, although only distantly allied, have inherited so much in common in their constitution, that they are apt to vary under similar exciting causes in a similar manner; and this would obviously aid in the acquirement through natural selection of parts or organs, strikingly like each other, independently of their direct inheritance from a common progenitor.
As species belonging to distinct classes have often been adapted by successive slight modifications to live under nearly similar circumstances,— to inhabit, for instance, the three elements of land, air, and water,— we can perhaps understand how it is that a numerical parallelism has sometimes been observed between the sub-groups of distinct classes.
A naturalist, struck with a parallelism of this nature, by arbitrarily raising or sinking the value of the groups in several classes (and all our experience shows that their valuation is as yet arbitrary), could easily extend the parallelism over a wide range; and thus the septenary, quinary, quaternary and ternary classifications have probably arisen.
There is another and curious class of cases in which close external resemblance does not depend on adaptation to similar habits of life, but has been gained for the sake of protection.
I allude to the wonderful manner in which certain butterflies imitate, as first described by Mr. Bates, other and quite distinct species.
|
|
| The most remarkable case of analogical resemblance ever recorded, though not dependent on adaptation to similar conditions of life, is that given by Mr. Bates with respect to certain butterflies in the Amazonian region closely mimicking other kinds. This excellent observer shows
that in a
district
where,
for instance, an Ithomia abounds in gaudy swarms, another butterfly, namely, a Leptalis, is
often found
mingled in the same flock,
and
so
closely resembles
the Ithomia in every shade and stripe of colour and even in the shape of its wings, that Mr. Bates, with his eyes sharpened by collecting during eleven years, was, though always on his guard, continually deceived. When the mockers and the mocked are caught and compared
they are found to be totally
different in essential structure, and to belong not only to distinct genera, but often to distinct families. Had
this mimicry occurred
in only one or two instances, it might have been passed over as a strange coincidence. But,
if we proceed
from a district where one Leptalis imitates an
Ithomia, another mocking
and mocked
species belonging to the same genera,
equally close in their resemblance, will
be found. Altogether no less than ten genera are enumerated, which include species that imitate other butterflies. The mockers and mocked always inhabit the same region; we never find an imitator living remote from the form which it imitates. The mockers are almost invariably rare insects; the mocked in almost every case abound in swarms. In the same district in which a species of Leptalis closely imitates an Ithomia, there are sometimes other Lepidoptera mimicking the same Ithomia;
so that in the same place, species of three genera of butterflies and even a
moth
are
found all closely resembling a butterfly belonging to
a fourth genus. It deserves especial notice that many of the mimicking forms of the Leptalis, as well as of the mimicked forms, can be shown by a graduated series to be merely varieties of the same species; whilst others are undoubtedly distinct species. But why, it may be asked, are certain forms treated as the mimicked and others as the mimickers? Mr. Bates satisfactorily answers this question, by showing that the form which is imitated keeps the usual dress of the group to which it belongs, whilst the counterfeiters have changed their dress and do not resemble their nearest allies. |
|
| We are next led to inquire what reason can possibly
be assigned for certain butterflies and moths so often assuming the dress of another
and quite distinct form;
why, to the perplexity of naturalists, has nature condescended
to the tricks of the stage? Mr. Bates has, no
doubt, hit on the true explanation. The mocked forms, which always abound in numbers, must habitually escape
destruction to a large extent,
otherwise they could not exist in such swarms; and Mr. Bates never saw them preyed on by
birds and certain large insects which attack other butterflies.
He has good reason to believe
that this immunity is owing to a peculiar and offensive odour which
they emit. The mocking forms, on the other hand, that
inhabit the same district, are comparatively rare, and belong to rare groups; hence they must suffer habitually from some danger, for otherwise, from the number of eggs laid by all butterflies, they would
in
three or four generations swarm over the whole country. Now if a member of one of these persecuted and rare groups were to assume a dress so like that of a well-protected species that it continually deceived the practised eyes of an entomologist, it would often deceive predacious
birds and insects, and thus escape much destruction.
Mr. Bates
may almost be said to have actually
witnessed the process by which the mimickers have come so closely to resemble the mimicked; for he found
that some of the forms of Leptalis
which
mimic so many other butterflies, varied in an extreme degree. In one district several varieties occurred,
and of these one alone resembled
to a certain extent, the common Ithomia of the same district. In another district there were
two or three varieties, one of which was
much commoner than the others, and this closely mocked another form of
Ithomia. From facts
of this nature, Mr. Bates concludes that the Leptalis first
varies;
and when
a variety happens
to resemble in some degree any common butterfly inhabiting the same district, this variety, from its resemblance to a flourishing
and
little-persecuted kind, has
a better chance of escaping destruction from predacious
birds and insects, and is
consequently oftener preserved;— "the less perfect degrees of resemblance being generation after generation eliminated, and only the others left to propagate their kind." So that here we have an excellent illustration of natural
selection. |
|
| Mr.
Wallace has recently
described several equally striking cases of mimicry
in the Lepidoptera of the Malay Archipelago,
and other instances could be given with other orders of
insects. Mr. Wallace has also described
one case of mimicry amongst
birds, but we have no such cases
with the larger quadrupeds. The much greater frequency of mimicry
with insects than with other animals, is probably the consequence of their small size; insects cannot defend themselves, excepting indeed the kinds that
sting, and I have never heard of an instance of these
mocking other insects, though they are mocked;
insects cannot escape
by flight from the larger animals;
hence
they are reduced, like most weak creatures, to trickery and dissimulation. |
|
But to return to more ordinary cases of analogical resemblance: as members of distinct classes have often been adapted by successive slight modifications to live under nearly similar circumstances,— to inhabit, for instance, the three elements of land, air, and water,— we can perhaps understand how it is that a numerical parallelism has sometimes been observed between the subgroups
in distinct classes. A naturalist, struck by a parallelism of this nature in any one class, by arbitrarily raising or sinking the value of the groups in other classes (and all our experience shows that their
valuation is as yet
arbitrary), could easily extend the parallelism over a wide range; and thus the septenary, quinary, quaternary, and ternary classifications have probably arisen. ↑| 2 blocks not present in 1866 1869 1872; present in 1859 1860 1861 | | As members of distinct classes have often been adapted by successive slight modifications to live under nearly similar circumstances,— to inhabit
for instance
the three elements of land, air, and water,— we can perhaps understand how it is that a numerical parallelism
has sometimes been observed between the sub-groups in distinct classes.
A naturalist, struck by a parallelism of this nature in any one class, by arbitrarily raising or sinking the value of the groups in other classes (and all our experience shows that this valuation has hitherto been arbitrary), could easily extend the parallelism over a wide range; and thus the septenary, quinary, quaternary, and ternary classifications have probably arisen.
|
| 3 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869; present in 1872 | | It should be observed that the process of imitation probably never commenced between forms widely dissimilar in colour.
But starting with species already somewhat like each other, the closest resemblance, if beneficial, could readily be gained by the above means; and if the imitated form was subsequently and gradually modified through any agency, the imitating form would be led along the same track, and thus be altered to almost any extent, so that it might ultimately assume an appearance or colouring wholly unlike that of the other members of the family to which it belonged.
There is, however, some difficulty on this head, for it is necessary to suppose in some cases that ancient members belonging to several distinct groups, before they had diverged to their present extent, accidentally resembled a member of another and protected group in a sufficient degree to afford some slight protection, this having given the basis for the subsequent acquisition of the most perfect resemblance.
|
|
|
On
the
Nature
of
the
Affinities
connecting
Organic
Beings
.—
|
As the modified descendants of dominant species,
belonging to the larger genera, tend to inherit the
advantages | advantages 1861 1866 1869 1872 | | advantages, 1859 1860 |
| within each class thus 1861 1866 1869 1872 |
| thus 1859 1860 |
|
