Comparison with 1866 |
|
We thus see,
that, that, 1866 1869 1872 | that 1859 1860 1861 |
although there is a clear and fundamental
difference between the mere adhesion of grafted stocks, and the union of the male and female elements in the act of reproduction, yet that there is a rude degree of parallelism in the results of grafting and of crossing distinct species. And as we must look at the curious and complex laws governing the facility with which trees can be grafted on each other as incidental on unknown differences in their vegetative systems, so I believe that the still more complex laws governing the facility of first
crosses crosses 1861 1866 1869 1872 | crosses, 1859 1860 |
are incidental on unknown
differences differences 1866 1869 1872 | differences, 1859 1860 1861 |
....... 1866 1869 1872 | chiefly 1859 1860 1861 |
in their reproductive systems. These differences,
in both cases, follow to a certain extent, as might have been expected, systematic affinity, by which every
kind of resemblance and dissimilarity between organic beings is attempted to be expressed. The facts by no means seem to me to
indicate that the greater or lesser difficulty of either grafting or crossing together
various species has been a special endowment; although in the case of crossing, the difficulty is as important for the endurance and stability of specific forms, as in the case of grafting it is unimportant for their welfare. |
Origin and Causes
Origin and Causes
1866 1869 1872 |
Causes
1859 1860 1861 |
of
of
1866 1869 1872 |
of
1859 1860 1861 |
the
the
1866 1869 1872 |
the
1859 1860 1861 |
Sterility
Sterility
1866 1869 1872 |
Sterility
1859 1860 1861 |
of
of
1866 1869 1872 |
of
1859 1860 1861 |
first
first
1866 1869 1872 |
first
1859 1860 1861 |
Crosses
Crosses
1866 1869 1872 |
Crosses
1859 1860 1861 |
and
and
1866 1869 1872 |
and
1859 1860 1861 |
of
of
1866 1869 1872 |
of
1859 1860 1861 |
Hybrids
.
Hybrids
. 1866 |
Hybrids
.—
1859 1860 |
Hybrids
.—
1861 |
Hybrids
. 1869 1872 |
|
Text in this page (from paragraph 2800, sentence 100 to paragraph 2800, sentence 400, word 22) is not present in 1866 |
We thus see,
that that 1859 1860 1861 | that, 1866 1869 1872 |
although there is a clear and
fundamental fundamental 1859 1860 1861 1866 | great 1869 1872 |
difference between the mere adhesion of grafted stocks, and the union of the male and female elements in the act of reproduction, yet that there is a rude degree of parallelism in the results of grafting and of crossing distinct species. And as we must look at the curious and complex laws governing the facility with which trees can be grafted on each other as incidental on unknown differences in their vegetative systems, so I believe that the still more complex laws governing the facility of first
crosses, crosses, 1859 1860 | crosses 1861 1866 1869 1872 |
are incidental on unknown
differences, differences, 1859 1860 1861 | differences 1866 1869 1872 |
chiefly chiefly 1859 1860 1861 | chiefly 1866 1869 1872 |
in their reproductive systems. These
differences, differences, 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | differences 1872 |
in both cases, follow to a certain extent, as might have been expected, systematic affinity, by which
every every 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | term every 1872 |
kind of resemblance and dissimilarity between organic beings is attempted to be expressed. The facts by no means seem to
me to me to 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | me to 1872 |
indicate that the greater or lesser difficulty of either grafting or crossing
together together 1859 1860 1861 1866 | together 1869 1872 |
various species has been a special endowment; although in the case of crossing, the difficulty is as important for the endurance and stability of specific forms, as in the case of grafting it is unimportant for their welfare. |
Causes
Causes
1859 1860 1861 |
Origin and Causes
1866 1869 1872 |
of
of
1859 1860 1861 |
of
1866 1869 1872 |
the
the
1859 1860 1861 |
the
1866 1869 1872 |
Sterility
Sterility
1859 1860 1861 |
Sterility
1866 1869 1872 |
of
of
1859 1860 1861 |
of
1866 1869 1872 |
first
first
1859 1860 1861 |
first
1866 1869 1872 |
Crosses
Crosses
1859 1860 1861 |
Crosses
1866 1869 1872 |
and
and
1859 1860 1861 |
and
1866 1869 1872 |
of
of
1859 1860 1861 |
of
1866 1869 1872 |
Hybrids
.—
Hybrids
.—
1859 1860 |
Hybrids
.—
1861 |
Hybrids
. 1866 |
Hybrids
. 1869 1872 |
|
We may now look a little closer at the probable causes of the sterility of first crosses and of hybrids. ↑4 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861; present in 1866 1869 1872 | At one time it appeared to me probable, as it has to others, that this
sterility might
have been acquired through
natural selection slowly acting on a
slightly lessened degree
of fertility, which
at first spontaneously appeared,
like any other variation, in
certain individuals of one variety when crossed with another
variety.
For it would clearly be advantageous to two varieties or incipient species, if they could be kept from blending, on the same principle that, when man is selecting at the same time two varieties, it is necessary that he should keep them separate.
In the first place, it may be remarked that distinct
regions are often inhabited by groups of species and by single species which when brought together and crossed are found to be more or less sterile;
now it could clearly have been of no advantage to such separated species to have been rendered mutually sterile, and consequently this could not have been effected through natural selection; but it may perhaps be argued
with truth,
that, if a species were
rendered sterile with some one compatriot, sterility with other species would probably
follow as a necessary contingency.
In the second place, it is as
much opposed to the theory of natural selection as to that of special creation, that in reciprocal crosses the male element of one a
second form, whilst at the same time the male element of this second form is enabled freely to fertilise the first form. |
These two cases are fundamentally different, for, as just remarked, in the union of two pure species the male and female sexual elements are perfect, whereas in hybrids they are imperfect. Even in first crosses, the greater or lesser difficulty in effecting
a
union apparently depends on several distinct causes. There must sometimes be a physical impossibility in the male element reaching the ovule, as would be the case with a plant
|