during a period of
elevation elevation 1861 | elevation, 1866 1869 1872 |
and yet not suffer excessively from denudation during its slow upheaval; but the thickness of the formation could not be great, for owing to the elevatory movement it would be less than the
depth, depth, 1861 | depth 1866 1869 1872 |
supposed to be shallow; supposed to be shallow; 1861 |
in which it was formed; nor would 1866 1869 1872 |
the deposit
would not generally would not generally 1861 |
OMIT 1866 1869 1872 |
be much consolidated, nor
would it would it 1861 | would it 1866 1869 1872 |
be capped by
overlying overlying 1861 1866 1872 | over- lying 1869 |
formations, so that it would run a good chance of being worn away
during during 1861 |
by atmospheric degradation and by the action of the sea during 1866 1869 1872 |
subsequent oscillations of level. It
has has 1861 | has, 1866 1869 1872 |
been been 1861 | however, been 1866 1869 1872 |
suggested by Mr. Hopkins, that if one part of the area, after rising and before being denuded, subsided, the deposit formed during the rising movement, though not thick, might
become become 1861 | afterwards become 1866 1869 1872 |
protected by fresh accumulations, and thus be preserved for
an extremely long period,— a consideration which I formerly overlooked. an extremely long period,— a consideration which I formerly overlooked. 1861 |
a long period. 1866 1869 1872 |
|
|
Mr.
Hopkins, Hopkins, 1861 | Hopkins 1866 1869 1872 |
in commenting on this subject, states that he believes the entire destruction of any in commenting on this subject, states that he believes the entire destruction of any 1861 |
also expresses his belief that 1866 1869 1872 |
sedimentary
bed bed 1861 | beds 1866 1869 1872 |
of considerable horizontal extent
to
have
been of rare occurrence. been of rare occurrence. 1861 |
rarely been completely destroyed. 1866 1869 1872 |
↑1 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861; present in 1866 1869 1872 | But all geologists, excepting the few who believe that our present metamorphic schists and plutonic rocks once formed the primordial nucleus of the globe, will probably
admit that rocks of this nature must
have been denuded on
an enormous scale.
|
My remarks apply solely to beds rich in fossils: I have admitted that sediment accumulated in extremely thick, solid, or extensive masses would escape denudation. The point in question is, whether widely extended formations, rich in fossils, and of sufficient thickness to last for a long period, would be formed except during periods of subsidence? My impression is that this has rarely been the case. As the subject of complete denudation has been broached by Mr. Hopkins, I may remark that all geologists, excepting the few who believe that they see in the metamorphic schists and plutonic rocks the heated primordial nucleus of the globe, will probably admit that rocks of this nature must have been largely denuded. For it is scarcely possible that
these these 1861 1866 | such 1869 1872 |
rocks
should should 1861 | could 1866 1869 1872 |
have been solidified and crystallized
in a naked condition; in a naked condition; 1861 |
whilst uncovered; 1866 1869 1872 |
but if the metamorphic action occurred at
|