| → some slight 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
| a greater or less 1872 |
|
| → seem to me 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
| are 1869 1872 |
|
| Thus it comes that ancient and extinct genera are often in
→some slight
degree intermediate in
between their modified descendants, or between their collateral relations. |
|
|
nature the
will be far more complicated than is represented in the diagram; for the groups will have been more
they will have endured for extremely unequal lengths of time, and will have been modified in various degrees. As we possess only the last volume of the geological record, and that in a very broken condition, we have no right to expect, except in
rare cases, to fill up
intervals in the natural system, and thus
distinct families or orders. All that we have a right to
that those
which
within known geological
undergone much modification, should in the older formations make some slight approach to each other; so that the older members should differ less from each other in some of their characters than do the existing members of the same groups; and this by the concurrent evidence of our best palæontologists
frequently
the case. |
|
| Thus, on the theory of descent with modification, the main facts with respect to the mutual affinities of the extinct forms of life to each other and to living forms,
→seem to me
explained in a satisfactory manner. And they are wholly inexplicable on any other view. |
|
| On this same theory, it is evident that the fauna
any
period in the earth's history will be
in general character between that which preceded and that which succeeded it.
the species which lived at the sixth great stage of descent in the diagram are the modified offspring of those which lived at the fifth stage, and are the parents of those which became still more modified at the seventh stage; hence they could hardly fail to be nearly intermediate in
|
