All the many forms, extinct and recent, descended from
(A), (A), 1860 1861 1866 1869 1872 | A, 1859 |
make, as before remarked, one order; and this order, from the continued effects of extinction and divergence of character, has become divided into several sub-families and families, some of which are supposed to have perished at different periods, and some to have endured to the present day. |
By looking at the diagram we can see that if many of the extinct
forms forms 1872 | forms, 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
supposed to be
imbedded imbedded 1872 | embedded 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
in the successive formations, were discovered at several points low down in the series, the three existing families on the uppermost line would be rendered less distinct from each other. If, for instance, the genera
a
1
,
a
5
,
a
10
,
a
10
,
1872 |
a
10
,
1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
f
8
,
m
3
,
m
6
,
m
6
,
1872 |
m
6
,
1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
m
9
,
were
disinterred, disinterred, 1859 1860 1861 1869 1872 | distinterred, 1866 |
these three families would be so closely linked together that they probably would have to be united into one great family, in nearly the same manner as has occurred with ruminants and
certain pachyderms. certain pachyderms. 1861 1866 1869 1872 | pachyderms. 1859 1860 |
Yet he who objected to
consider as intermediate consider as intermediate 1872 |
call 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
the extinct
genera, genera, 1859 1860 1861 1872 | genera 1866 1869 |
which thus
link together link together 1872 | linked 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
the living genera of three
families, families, 1872 | families 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
...OMIT 1872 |
together, intermediate in character, 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
would be
partly justified, for partly justified, for 1872 |
justified, as 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
they are intermediate, not directly, but only by a long and circuitous course through many widely different forms. If many extinct forms were to be discovered above one of the middle horizontal lines or geological formations— for instance, above No. VI.— but none from beneath
this this 1859 1860 1861 1869 1872 | his 1866 |
line, then only
....... 1866 1869 1872 | the 1859 1860 1861 |
two
of the families (those of the families (those 1866 1869 1872 |
families 1859 1860 1861 |
on the left
hand, hand, 1866 1869 1872 | hand 1859 1860 1861 |
....... 1866 1869 1872 | (namely, 1859 1860 1861 |
a
14
,
a
14
,
1859 1860 1861 1866 1872 |
a
14
,
1869 |
&c., and
b
14
,
b
14
,
1859 1860 1861 1866 1872 |
b
14
,
1869 |
&c.) would have to be united into
one; one; 1866 1869 1872 | one 1859 1860 1861 |
....... 1866 1869 1872 | family; 1859 1860 1861 |
and
there would remain two families, which would be less distinct from each other than they were before the discovery of the fossils. there would remain two families, which would be less distinct from each other than they were before the discovery of the fossils. 1866 1869 1872 |
the two other families (namely,
a
14
to
f
14
now including five genera, and
o
14
to
m
14
) would yet remain distinct.
1859 1860 1861 |
So
again
if the three families formed of eight genera
(
a
14
to
m
14
),
m
14
),
1872 |
m
14
),
1869 |
on the uppermost line, be supposed to differ from each other by
half-a-dozen half-a-dozen 1872 |
half a dozen 1869 |
important characters, then the families which existed at the period marked VI. would certainly have differed from each other by a less number of characters; for they would at this early stage of descent have diverged in a less degree from their common progenitor. ↑1 blocks not present in 1866 1869 1872; present in 1859 1860 1861 | These two families, however, would be less distinct from each other than they were before the discovery of the fossils.
|
Thus it comes that ancient and extinct genera are often in
a greater or less a greater or less 1872 |
some slight 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
degree intermediate in
character character 1859 1860 1861 1869 1872 | cha- racter 1866 |
between their modified descendants, or between their collateral relations. |