| Comparison with 1860 | 
  | 
| 
its proper intermediate position; 
for  F  originally  was  intermediate  in  character  between  A  and  I,  and  the  several  genera  descended  from  these  two  genera  will  have  inherited  to  a  certain  extent  their  characters.  
This natural arrangement is shown, 
as 
far as is possible on paper, in the diagram, 
but in much too simple a manner.  If a branching diagram had not been used, and only 
the names of the groups had been written 
in a linear series, it 
would have been still less possible to have given a natural arrangement; 
and it is notoriously not possible to represent in a series, on a flat surface, the affinities which we discover in nature amongst the beings of the same group.  Thus, on 
the view which I hold, the 
natural system is genealogical in its arrangement, 
like a pedigree; 
but the degrees 
of modification which the different groups have undergone, 
have 
to be expressed by ranking them under different so-called genera, sub-families, families, sections, orders, and classes.  | 
 | 
 It may be worth while to illustrate this view of classification, by taking the case of languages.  If we possessed a perfect pedigree of mankind, a genealogical arrangement of the races of man would afford the best classification of the various languages now spoken throughout the world; and if all extinct languages, and all intermediate and slowly changing dialects, had 
to be included, such an arrangement 
 would, | would, 1859 1860 |  | would 1861 1866 1869 1872 |  
  
 I think, | I think, 1859 1860 |  I think, 1861 1866 1869 1872 |  
  
be the only possible one.  Yet it might be that some very ancient language had altered 
little, 
and had given rise to few new languages, whilst others (owing 
to the spreading 
and subsequent 
isolation 
and states 
of civilisation of the several races, 
descended 
from a common race) had altered much,  
and had given 
rise to many new languages 
and dialects.  The various degrees of difference in 
the languages from 
the same stock, would have to 
 | 
 
  
  
its proper intermediate 
 position; | position; 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | position. 1869 |  
  
 for | for 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  for 1869 |  
  
 F | F 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  F 1869 |  
  
 originally | originally 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  originally 1869 |  
  
 was | was 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  was 1869 |  
  
 intermediate | intermediate 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  intermediate 1869 |  
  
 in | in 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  in 1869 |  
  
 character | character 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  character 1869 |  
  
 between | between 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  between 1869 |  
  
 A | A 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  A 1869 |  
  
 and | and 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  and 1869 |  
  
 I, | I, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  I, 1869 |  
  
 and | and 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  and 1869 |  
  
 the | the 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  the 1869 |  
  
 several | several 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  several 1869 |  
  
 genera | genera 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  genera 1869 |  
  
 descended | descended 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  descended 1869 |  
  
 from | from 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  from 1869 |  
  
 these | these 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  these 1869 |  
  
 two | two 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  two 1869 |  
  
 genera | genera 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  genera 1869 |  
  
 will | will 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  will 1869 |  
  
 have | have 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  have 1869 |  
  
 inherited | inherited 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  inherited 1869 |  
  
 to | to 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  to 1869 |  
  
 a | a 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  a 1869 |  
  
 certain | certain 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  certain 1869 |  
  
 extent | extent 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  extent 1869 |  
  
 their | their 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  their 1869 |  
  
 characters. | characters. 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  characters. 1869 |  
   This natural arrangement is 
 shown, | shown, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | shown 1869 |  
  
 as | as 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  
| in the diagram as 1869 |  
  
far as is possible on paper, 
 in the diagram, | in the diagram, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  
| OMIT 1869 |  
  
but in much too simple a manner.  If 
 a branching diagram had not been used, and only | a branching diagram had not been used, and only 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |  
| OMIT 1872 |  
  
the names of the groups had been 
 written | written 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |  
| simply written down 1872 |  
  
in a linear series, 
 it | it 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |  | the representation 1872 |  
  
would have been still less 
 possible to have given a natural arrangement; | possible to have given a natural arrangement; 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |  
| natural; 1872 |  
  
and it is notoriously not possible to represent in a series, on a flat surface, the affinities which we discover in nature amongst the beings of the same group.  Thus, 
 on | on 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |  on 1872 |  
  
the 
 view which I hold, the | view which I hold, the 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |  
| OMIT 1872 |  
  
natural system is genealogical in its 
 arrangement, | arrangement, 1859 1860 1861 1869 1872 |  | arrange- ment, 1866 |  
  
like a 
 pedigree; | pedigree; 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |  | pedigree: 1872 |  
  
but the 
 degrees | degrees 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | amount 1869 1872 |  
  
of modification which the different groups have 
 undergone, | undergone, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | undergone 1869 1872 |  
  
 have | have 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | has 1869 1872 |  
  
to be expressed by ranking them under different so-called genera, sub-families, families, sections, orders, and classes.  | 
 | 
 It may be worth while to illustrate this view of classification, by taking the case of languages.  If we possessed a perfect pedigree of mankind, a genealogical arrangement of the races of man would afford the best classification of the various languages now spoken throughout the world; and if all extinct languages, and all intermediate and slowly changing dialects, 
 had | had 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |  | were 1872 |  
  
to be included, such an arrangement 
 would | would 1861 1866 1869 1872 |  | would, 1859 1860 |  
  
 ..| ..... 1861 1866 1869 1872 |  | I think, 1859 1860 |  
  
be the only possible one.  Yet it might be that some 
 very ancient language had altered | very ancient language had altered 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  
| ancient languages had altered very 1869 1872 |  
  
 little, | little, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | little 1869 1872 |  
  
and had given rise to few new languages, whilst others 
 (owing | (owing 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  
| had altered much owing 1869 1872 |  
  
to the 
 spreading | spreading 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | spreading, 1869 1872 |  
  
 and subsequent | and subsequent 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  and subsequent 1869 1872 |  
  
 isolation | isolation 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |  | isolation, 1872 |  
  
and 
 states | states 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | state 1869 1872 |  
  
of civilisation of the several 
 races, | races, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  races, 1869 1872 |  
  
 descended | descended 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | co-descended 1869 1872 |  
  
 from a common race) had altered much, | from a common race) had altered much, 1859 1860 1861 |  
| from a common stock) had altered much, 1866 |  
| races, 1869 1872 |  
  
and had 
 given | given 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | thus given 1869 1872 |  
  
rise to many new 
 languages | languages 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | dialects 1869 1872 |  
  
and 
 dialects. | dialects. 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | languages. 1869 1872 |  
   The various degrees of difference 
 in | in 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | between 1869 1872 |  
  
the languages 
 from | from 1859 1860 1861 1866 |  | of 1869 1872 |  
  
the same stock, would have to 
 |