| → as 1859 1860 1861 1866 | 
| in the diagram as 1869 | 
  | 
| → in the diagram, 1859 1860 1861 1866 | 
| OMIT 1869 | 
  | 
| → a branching diagram had not been used, and only 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | 
| OMIT 1872 | 
  | 
| → written 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | 
| simply written down 1872 | 
  | 
| → possible to have given a natural arrangement; 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | 
| natural; 1872 | 
  | 
| → view which I hold, the 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | 
| OMIT 1872 | 
  | 
| → very ancient language had altered 1859 1860 1861 1866 | 
| ancient languages had altered very 1869 1872 | 
  | 
| → (owing 1859 1860 1861 1866 | 
| had altered much owing 1869 1872 | 
  | 
| → from a common race) had altered much, 1859 1860 1861 | 
| from a common stock) had altered much, 1866 | 
| races, 1869 1872 | 
  | 
 
  
  
| 
its proper intermediate 
 This natural arrangement is 
→as 
far as is possible on paper, 
→in the diagram, 
but in much too simple a manner.  If 
→a branching diagram had not been used, and only 
the names of the groups had been 
→written 
in a linear series, 
would have been still less 
→possible to have given a natural arrangement; 
and it is notoriously not possible to represent in a series, on a flat surface, the affinities which we discover in nature amongst the beings of the same group.  Thus, 
the 
→view which I hold, the 
natural system is genealogical in its 
like a 
but the 
of modification which the different groups have 
to be expressed by ranking them under different so-called genera, sub-families, families, sections, orders, and classes.  | 
 | 
|  It may be worth while to illustrate this view of classification, by taking the case of languages.  If we possessed a perfect pedigree of mankind, a genealogical arrangement of the races of man would afford the best classification of the various languages now spoken throughout the world; and if all extinct languages, and all intermediate and slowly changing dialects, 
to be included, such an arrangement 
be the only possible one.  Yet it might be that some 
→very ancient language had altered 
and had given rise to few new languages, whilst others 
→(owing 
to the 
and 
of civilisation of the several 
→from a common race) had altered much, 
and had 
rise to many new 
and 
 The various degrees of difference 
the languages 
the same stock, would have to 
 |