| → vertebrate 1859 1860 1861 | 
| and then less differentiated vertebrate 1866 | 
| and at that time less differentiated vertebrate 1869 1872 | 
  | 
| → as in that of 1859 1860 1861 1866 | 
| as with 1869 | 
| for instance 1872 | 
  | 
| → but 1859 1860 1861 | 
| and only partially 1866 1869 1872 | 
  | 
| → from other groups, as all would blend together by steps as fine as those between existing varieties, nevertheless 1861 | 
| from other groups, as all would blend together by steps as fine as those between the finest existing varieties, nevertheless 1859 1860 | 
| from other groups, as all would be blended together by steps as fine as those between existing varieties, nevertheless 1866 | 
| still 1869 1872 | 
  | 
 
  
  
| 
circuitous lines of affinity of various lengths (as may be seen in the diagram so often referred to), mounting up through many predecessors.  As it is difficult to show the blood-relationship between the numerous kindred of any ancient and noble 
even by the aid of a genealogical tree, and almost impossible to do 
without this aid, we can understand the 
difficulty which naturalists have experienced in describing, without the aid of a diagram, the various affinities which they perceive between the many living and extinct members of the same great natural class.  | 
 | 
|  Extinction, as we have seen in the fourth chapter, has played an important part in defining and widening the intervals between the several groups in each class.  We may thus account 
for the distinctness of whole classes from each other— for instance, of birds from all other vertebrate animals— by the belief that many ancient forms of life have been utterly lost, through which the early progenitors of birds were formerly connected with the early progenitors of the other 
→vertebrate 
classes.  There has been 
extinction of the forms of life which once connected fishes with batrachians.  There has been still less 
some 
classes, 
→as in that of 
the Crustacea, for here the most 
diverse forms are still 
together by 
→but 
of affinities.  Extinction has only 
it has by no means made them; for if every form which has ever lived on this earth were suddenly to reappear, though it would be quite impossible to give definitions by which each group could be 
→from other groups, as all would blend together by steps as fine as those between existing varieties, nevertheless 
a natural classification, or at least a natural arrangement, would be possible.  We shall see this by turning to the 
the letters, A to L, 
 |