Origin of Species Variorum

Comparison with 1869

the parts in distinct species are homologous, but few serial homologies can be indicated; that is, we are seldom enabled to say that one part .. is homologous with another part in the same individual. And we can understand this fact; for in molluscs, even in the lowest members of the class, we do not find nearly so much indefinite repetition of any one part, as we find in the other great classes of the animal and vegetable kingdoms. ↑

Naturalists frequently speak of the skull as formed of metamorphosed vertebræ; the jaws of crabs as metamorphosed legs; the stamens and pistils in flowers as metamorphosed leaves; but it would in most cases probably be more correct, as Professor Huxley has remarked, to speak of both skull and vertebræ, both jaws and legs, &c., as having been metamorphosed, not one from the other, as they now exist, but from some common and simpler element. Most naturalists, however, use such language only in a metaphorical sense; they are far from meaning that during a long course of descent, primordial organs of any kind— vertebræ in the one case and legs in the other— have actually been converted into skulls or jaws. Yet so strong is the appearance of this having occurred, that naturalists can hardly avoid employing language having this plain signification. According to the views here maintained, such language may be used literally; and the wonderful fact of the jaws, for instance, of a crab retaining numerous characters, which they probably would have retained through inheritance, if they had really been metamorphosed ... from true though extremely simple legs, is explained.

Embryology and Development .

This is one of the most important departments of natural history. ↑ These are generally effected somewhat abruptly by a few stages and in a concealed manner; but the transformations are in reality numerous and graduated. For instance, Sir J. Lubbock has recently shown that a certain ephemerous insect (Chlöeon) during its development moults above twenty times, and each time undergoes a certain amount of change; in such cases we probably behold the act of metamorphosis in its natural or primary progress. What great changes of structure are effected during the development of some animals is seen in the case of insects, but still more plainly with many crustaceans. When, however, we read of the several wonderful cases, recently discovered, of the so-called alternate generations of animals, we come to the climax of developmental transformation. What fact can be more astonishing than that a delicate branching coralline, studded with polypi and attached to a submarine rock, should produce, first by budding and then by transverse division, a host of huge floating jelly-fishes; and that these should produce eggs, from which are hatched swimming animalcules, which attach themselves to rocks and become developed into branching corallines; and so on in an endless cycle? This view of the close connection between alternate generations and ordinary metamorphoses has recently been much strengthened by Wagner's discovery of the larva of a Cecidomyia,— that is of the maggot of a fly, — producing asexually within its body other and similar larvæ; these again repeating the process. ↑

It has already been stated that various parts and organs in the same individual are exactly like each other during an early embryonic period, but in the adult state become widely different and serve for widely different purposes.

the parts of one species with those of other and distinct species, we can indicate but few serial homologies; that is, we are seldom enabled to say that one part or organ is homologous with another in the same individual. And we can understand this fact; for in molluscs, even in the lowest members of the class, we do not find nearly so much indefinite repetition of any one part, as we find in the other great classes of the animal and vegetable kingdoms. ↑

Naturalists frequently speak of the skull as formed of metamorphosed vertebræ: the jaws of crabs as metamorphosed legs; the stamens and pistils of flowers as metamorphosed leaves; but it would in these cases probably be more correct, as Professor Huxley has remarked, to speak of both skull and vertebræ, both jaws and legs, &c.,— as having been metamorphosed, not one from the other, but from some common element. Naturalists, however, use such language only in a metaphorical sense: they are far from meaning that during a long course of descent, primordial organs of any kind— vertebræ in the one case and legs in the other— have actually been modified into skulls or jaws. Yet so strong is the appearance of a modification of this nature having occurred, that naturalists can hardly avoid employing language having this plain signification. On my view these terms may be used literally; and the wonderful fact of the jaws, for instance, of a crab retaining numerous characters, which they would probably have retained through inheritance, if they had really been metamorphosed during a long course of descent from true legs, or from some simple appendage, is explained. ↑ ↑

Embryology .—

It has already been casually remarked that certain organs in the individual, which when mature become widely different and serve for different purposes, are in the embryo exactly alike.