Comparison with 1860 |
|
or those by which the species of the same genus differ from each other, be more variable than the
generic characters in which they all agree? Why, for instance, should the colour of a flower be more likely to vary in any one species of a genus, if the other species,
supposed to have been created independently, have
differently coloured flowers, than if all the species of the genus have
the same coloured flowers? If species are only well-marked varieties, of which the characters have become in a high degree permanent, we can understand this fact; for they have already varied since they branched off from a common progenitor in certain characters, by which they have come to be specifically distinct from each other; and
therefore these same characters would be more likely still
to be variable
than the generic characters which have been inherited without change for an enormous
period. It is inexplicable on the theory of creation why a part developed in a very unusual manner in any
one species of
a genus, and therefore, as we may naturally infer, of great importance to the
species, should be eminently liable to variation; but, on my
view, this part has undergone,
since the several species branched off from a common progenitor, an unusual amount of variability and modification, and therefore we might expect this
part generally to be still variable. But a part may be developed in the most unusual manner, like the wing of a bat, and yet not be more variable than any other structure, if the part be common to many subordinate forms, that is, if it has been inherited for a very long period; for in this case it will have been rendered constant by long-continued natural selection. |
|
Glancing at instincts, marvellous as some are, they offer no greater difficulty than does
corporeal structure
on the theory of the natural selection of successive, slight, but profitable modifications. We can thus understand
|
or those by which the species of the same genus differ from each other, be more variable than
the the 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | the 1872 |
generic characters in which they all agree? Why, for instance, should the colour of a flower be more likely to vary in any one species of a genus, if the other
species, species, 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | species 1872 |
supposed to have been created independently, have supposed to have been created independently, have 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
possess 1872 |
differently coloured flowers, than if all
the species of the genus have the species of the genus have 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
possessed 1872 |
the same coloured flowers? If species are only well-marked varieties, of which the characters have become in a high degree permanent, we can understand this fact; for they have already varied since they branched off from a common progenitor in certain characters, by which they have come to be specifically distinct from each other;
and and 1859 1860 1861 1866 | and 1869 1872 |
therefore these same characters would be more likely
still still 1859 1860 1861 1866 | again 1869 1872 |
to
be variable be variable 1859 1860 1861 1866 | vary 1869 1872 |
than the generic characters which have been inherited without change for an
enormous enormous 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | immense 1872 |
period. It is inexplicable on the theory of creation why a part developed in a very unusual manner in
any any 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | any 1872 |
one species
of of 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | alone of 1872 |
a genus, and therefore, as we may naturally infer, of great importance to
the the 1859 1860 1861 | that 1866 1869 1872 |
species, should be eminently liable to variation; but, on
my my 1859 1860 1861 1866 | our 1869 1872 |
view, this part has
undergone, undergone, 1859 1860 1861 1866 1872 | undergone 1869 |
since the several species branched off from a common progenitor, an unusual amount of variability and modification, and therefore we might expect
this this 1859 1860 1861 | the 1866 1869 1872 |
part generally to be still variable. But a part may be developed in the most unusual manner, like the wing of a bat, and yet not be more variable than any other structure, if the part be common to many subordinate forms, that is, if it has been inherited for a very long period; for in this case it will have been rendered constant by long-continued natural selection. |
|
Glancing at instincts, marvellous as some are, they offer no greater difficulty than
does does 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | do 1872 |
corporeal
structure structure 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | structures 1872 |
on the theory of the natural selection of successive, slight, but profitable modifications. We can thus understand
|